Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27334592›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2016

Pestivirus Npro Directly Interacts with Interferon Regulatory Factor 3 Monomer and Dimer.

Keerthi Gottipati, Luis Marcelo F Holthauzen, Nicolas Ruggli, Kyung H Choi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Pestiviruses infection: Interferon-virus mutual regulation.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. An evolutionary divergent pestivirus lacking the NEmerging microbes & infections · 2019
    Article
  12. Immune Ecosystem of Virus-Infected Host Tissues.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keerthi GottipatiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5806-4654
Luis Marcelo F HolthauzenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Nicolas RuggliThe Institute of Virology and Immunology (IVI), Mittelhäusern, Switzerland.
Kyung H ChoiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA kychoi@utmb.edu.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledInterferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) is a transcription factor involved in the activation of type I alpha/beta interferon (IFN-α/β) in response to viral infection. Upon viral infection, the IRF3 monomer is activated into a phosphorylated dimer, which induces the transcription of interferon genes in the nucleus. Viruses have evolved several ways to target IRF3 in order to subvert the innate immune response. Pestiviruses, such as classical swine fever virus (CSFV), target IRF3 for ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation. This is mediated by the viral protein N(pro) that interacts with IRF3, but the molecular details for this interaction are largely unknown. We used recombinant N(pro) and IRF3 proteins and show that N(pro) interacts with IRF3 directly without additional proteins and forms a soluble 1:1 complex. The full-length IRF3 but not merely either of the individual domains is required for this interaction. The interaction between N(pro) and IRF3 is not dependent on the activation state of IRF3, since N(pro) binds to a constitutively active form of IRF3 in the presence of its transcriptional coactivator, CREB-binding protein (CBP). The results indicate that the N(pro)-binding site on IRF3 encompasses a region that is unperturbed by the phosphorylation and subsequent activation of IRF3 and thus excludes the dimer interface and CBP-binding site. IMPORTANCE: The pestivirus N-terminal protease, N(pro), is essential for evading the host's immune system by facilitating the degradation of interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3). However, the nature of the N(pro) interaction with IRF3, including the IRF3 species (inactive monomer versus activated dimer) that N(pro) targets for degradation, is largely unknown. We show that classical swine fever virus N(pro) and porcine IRF3 directly interact in solution and that full-length IRF3 is required for interaction with N(pro) Additionally, N(pro) interacts with a constitutively active form of IRF3 bound to its transcriptional cofactor, the CREB-binding protein. This is the first study to demonstrate that N(pro) is able to bind both inactive IRF3 monomer and activated IRF3 dimer and thus likely targets both IRF3 species for ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsClassical Swine Fever VirusEndopeptidasesInterferon Regulatory Factor-3Protein BindingProtein Interaction MappingViral ProteinsEndopeptidasesInterferon Regulatory Factor-3N(pro) protein, swine fever virusViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27334592
PMCPMC4988160
OpenAlexW2468309799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.