Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27334562›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2016

Using Visual Analogue Scales in eHealth: Non-Response Effects in a Lifestyle Intervention.

Tim Kuhlmann, Ulf-Dietrich Reips, Julian Wienert, Sonia Lippke

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01909349 (Rehabiliation-Aftercare for an Optimal Transfer Into Autonomous Daily Life), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01909349 nacompletednot on this map

Rehabiliation-Aftercare for an Optimal Transfer Into Autonomous Daily Life (RENATA) - an eHealth Intervention Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorJacobs University Bremen gGmbHRan2013 to 2016Enrolled1,000ConditionsCARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, HEART DISEASESArmsself-regulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the origin and conceptual framework of the EQ VAS.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Brief lifestyle advice in cardiac care: an experimental study on message source and framing.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tim KuhlmannResearch Methods, Assessment & iScience, Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany. tim.kuhlmann@uni-konstanz.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4673-1733
Ulf-Dietrich ReipsORCID 0000-0002-1566-4745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVisual analogue scales (VASs) have been shown to be valid measurement instruments and a better alternative to Likert-type scales in Internet-based research, both empirically and theoretically [1,2]. Upsides include more differentiated responses, better measurement level, and less error. Their feasibility and properties in the context of eHealth, however, have not been examined so far.

objectiveThe present study examined VASs in the context of a lifestyle study conducted online, measuring the impact of VASs on distributional properties and non-response.

methodA sample of 446 participants with a mean age of 52.4 years (standard deviation (SD) = 12.1) took part in the study. The study was carried out as a randomized controlled trial, aimed at supporting participants over 8 weeks with an additional follow-up measurement. In addition to the randomized questionnaire, participants were further randomly assigned to either a Likert-type or VAS response scale version of the measures.

resultsResults showed that SDs were lower for items answered via VASs, 2P (Y ≥ 47 | n=55, P=.5) < .001. Means did not differ across versions. Participants in the VAS version showed lower dropout rates than participants in the Likert version, odds ratio = 0.75, 90% CI (0.58-0.98), P=.04. Number of missing values did not differ between questionnaire versions.

conclusionsThe VAS is shown to be a valid instrument in the eHealth context, offering advantages over Likert-type scales. The results of the study provide further support for the use of VASs in Internet-based research, extending the scope to senior samples in the health context.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01909349; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01909349 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6h88sLw2Y).

Indexed as

AftercareCardiac RehabilitationHealth BehaviorTelemedicineVisual Analog ScaleAdultDiet, HealthyExerciseFemaleHumansInternetLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPatient DropoutsdropouteHealthInternet sciencemeasurementRCTVASvisual analogue scale

Identifiers

PMID27334562
PMCPMC4935790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.