Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27334542›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2016

Improving public health intervention for mosquito-borne disease: the value of geovisualization using source of infection and LandScan data.

E J Flies, C R Williams, P Weinstein, S J Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E J FliesUniversity of South Australia,School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences,Adelaide,SA,Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1013-0330
C R WilliamsUniversity of South Australia,School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences,Adelaide,SA,Australia.
P WeinsteinAdelaide University,School of Biological Sciences,Molecular Life Sciences Ground Level,Adelaide,SA,Australia.
S J AndersonUniversity of South Australia,School of Natural and Built Environments,Adelaide,SA,Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9456-0193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemiological studies use georeferenced health data to identify disease clusters but the accuracy of this georeferencing is obfuscated by incorrectly assigning the source of infection and by aggregating case data to larger geographical areas. Often, place of residence (residence) is used as a proxy for the source of infection (source) which may not be accurate. Using a 21-year dataset from South Australia of human infections with the mosquito-borne Ross River virus, we found that 37% of cases were believed to have been acquired away from home. We constructed two risk maps using age-standardized morbidity ratios (SMRs) calculated using residence and patient-reported source. Both maps confirm significant inter-suburb variation in SMRs. Areas frequently named as the source (but not residence) and the highest-risk suburbs both tend to be tourist locations with vector mosquito habitat, and camping or outdoor recreational opportunities. We suggest the highest-risk suburbs as places to focus on for disease control measures. We also use a novel application of ambient population data (LandScan) to improve the interpretation of these risk maps and propose how this approach can aid in implementing disease abatement measures on a smaller scale than for which disease data are available.

Indexed as

Alphavirus InfectionsAnimalsArbovirusesArbovirus InfectionsCulicidaeInsect VectorsPublic HealthRemote Sensing TechnologyRisk AssessmentRoss River virusSouth AustraliaEpidemiologygeographical information systemsLandScanpublic healthvector-borne disease

Identifiers

PMID27334542
PMCPMC9150398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.