Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27334493›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2017

Reliability assessment of AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system and Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) for thoracolumbar spine injuries: results of a multicentre study.

Rahul Kaul, Harvinder Singh Chhabra, Alexander R Vaccaro, Rainer Abel, Sagun Tuli, Ajoy Prasad Shetty, Kali Dutta Das, Bibhudendu Mohapatra, Ankur Nanda, Gururaj M Sangondimath and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Acute management of spinal fractures: What you need to know.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Thoracolumbar spine trauma: a guide for the FRCS examination.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Superiority of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS) over AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification for the surgical management decision of traumatic spine injury in the pediatric population.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. [Risk factors of recurrent kyphosis in thoracolumbar burst fracture patients treated by short segmental pedicle screw fixation].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Classifications in Brief: AO Thoracolumbar Classification System.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rahul KaulDepartment of Orthopedics, Flt. Lt. Rajan Dhal, Fortis Hospital, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.
Harvinder Singh ChhabraIndian Spinal Injuries Center, Sector C, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India. drhschhabra@isiconline.org.
Alexander R VaccaroDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Delaware Valley Spinal Cord Injury Center, Rothman Institute, Sidney Kimmel Medical Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rainer AbelKlinik für Querschnittgelähmte, Orthopädie und Rheumatologie, Klinik Hohe Warte, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany.
Sagun TuliFlorida Spinal Surgery Center, Miami, FL, USA.
Ajoy Prasad ShettyDivision of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Spine Surgery, Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore, India.
Kali Dutta DasIndian Spinal Injuries Center, Sector C, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.
Bibhudendu MohapatraIndian Spinal Injuries Center, Sector C, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.
Ankur NandaIndian Spinal Injuries Center, Sector C, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.
Gururaj M SangondimathIndian Spinal Injuries Center, Sector C, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.
Murari Lal BansalIndian Spinal Injuries Center, Sector C, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.
Nishit PatelIndian Spinal Injuries Center, Sector C, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this multicentre study was to determine whether the recently introduced AOSpine Classification and Injury Severity System has better interrater and intrarater reliability than the already existing Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) for thoracolumbar spine injuries.

methodsClinical and radiological data of 50 consecutive patients admitted at a single centre with a diagnosis of an acute traumatic thoracolumbar spine injury were distributed to eleven attending spine surgeons from six different institutions in the form of PowerPoint presentation, who classified them according to both classifications. After time span of 6 weeks, cases were randomly rearranged and sent again to same surgeons for re-classification. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability for each component of TLICS and new AOSpine classification were evaluated using Fleiss Kappa coefficient (k value) and Spearman rank order correlation.

resultsModerate interrater and intrarater reliability was seen for grading fracture type and integrity of posterior ligamentous complex (Fracture type: k = 0.43 ± 0.01 and 0.59 ± 0.16, respectively, PLC: k = 0.47 ± 0.01 and 0.55 ± 0.15, respectively), and fair to moderate reliability (k = 0.29 ± 0.01 interobserver and 0.44+/0.10 intraobserver, respectively) for total score according to TLICS. Moderate interrater (k = 0.59 ± 0.01) and substantial intrarater reliability (k = 0.68 ± 0.13) was seen for grading fracture type regardless of subtype according to AOSpine classification. Near perfect interrater and intrarater agreement was seen concerning neurological status for both the classification systems.

conclusionsRecently proposed AOSpine classification has better reliability for identifying fracture morphology than the existing TLICS. Additional studies are clearly necessary concerning the application of these classification systems across multiple physicians at different level of training and trauma centers to evaluate not only their reliability and reproducibility, but also the other attributes, especially the clinical significance of a good classification system.

Indexed as

Injury Severity ScoreHumansLumbar VertebraeRandom AllocationReproducibility of ResultsSpinal InjuriesThoracic VertebraeAOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification SystemReliabilityThoracolumbar spine injuriesTLICS

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.