Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27334469›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2016

The nicotine + alcohol interoceptive drug state: contribution of the components and effects of varenicline in rats.

Patrick A Randall, Reginald Cannady, Joyce Besheer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. mGluPharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Considering Drug-Associated Contexts in Substance Use Disorders and Treatment Development.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrick A RandallBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Thurston-Bowles Building; CB#7178, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7178, USA.
Reginald CannadyBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Thurston-Bowles Building; CB#7178, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7178, USA.
Joyce BesheerBowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Thurston-Bowles Building; CB#7178, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7178, USA. jbesheer@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Supplement to Molecular and Cellular Studies on Alcohol's ActionsT32AA007573 · NIAAA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FULTON T CREWS, Thomas L. Kash · 1997 to 2026
$9.3M
The impact of HPA axis dysregulation on the interoceptive effects of alcohol - Admin SupplementR01AA019682 · NIAAA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BESHEER, JOYCE · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
Role of mPFC in sensitivity to nicotine-alcohol interoceptive cuesF32AA024674 · NIAAA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RANDALL, PATRICK A · 2016 to 2016
$56k
NIAAA NIH HHS F32 AA024674NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA019682NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleNicotine and alcohol co-use is highly prevalent, and as such, individuals experience the interoceptive effects of both substances together. Therefore, examining sensitivity to a compound nicotine and alcohol (N + A) interoceptive cue is critical to broaden our understanding of mechanisms that may contribute to nicotine and alcohol co-use.

objectivesThis work assessed the ability of a N + A interoceptive cue to gain control over goal-tracking behavior and determined the effects of the α4β2 nicotinic partial agonist and smoking cessation compound varenicline on sensitivity to N + A.

methodsTwo groups of male Long Evans rats were trained to discriminate N + A (0.4 mg/kg nicotine + 1 g/kg alcohol, intragastric gavage (IG)) from water under two different training conditions using a Pavlovian drug discrimination task. The effects of varenicline (0, 1, 3 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (IP)) administered alone and on sensitivity to N + A and the components were determined.

resultsUnder both training conditions, N + A rapidly gained control over behavior, with a greater contribution of nicotine to the N + A compound cue. Varenicline fully substituted for the N + A training dose, and varenicline (1 mg/kg) enhanced sensitivity to the lowest N + A dose (0.1 N + 0.1 A). Given the high selectivity of varenicline for the α4β2 receptor, this finding suggests a functional role for α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in modulating sensitivity to N + A.

conclusionsThe N + A compound cue is a unique cue that is modulated, in part, by activity at the α4β2 nAChR. These findings advance understanding of the interoceptive effects of nicotine and alcohol in combination and may have implications in relation to their co-use.

Indexed as

Receptors, NicotinicAnimalsCentral Nervous System DepressantsConditioning, ClassicalCuesDose-Response Relationship, DrugEthanolMaleNicotineNicotinic AgonistsRatsRats, Long-EvansSmoking CessationVareniclineCentral Nervous System DepressantsEthanolNicotineNicotinic Agonistsnicotinic receptor alpha4beta2Receptors, NicotinicVareniclineAlcoholFeature negative (FN)Feature positive (FP)NicotinePavlovian drug discrimination

Identifiers

PMID27334469
PMCPMC4990784
OpenAlexW2474391981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.