ReviewEuropean journal of nutrition2017
Celiac disease: understanding the gluten-free diet.
Review in European journal of nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
104 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 272 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short- and Long-Term Nutritional Status in Children and Adolescents with Celiac Disease Following a Gluten-Free Diet: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2025Pooled it
- Pancreatic Cancer in Celiac Disease Patients-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- European guideline on obesity care in patients with gastrointestinal and liver diseases - Joint European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism / United European Gastroenterology guideline.United European gastroenterology journal · 2022Guideline
- Nutritional Deficiencies in Children with Celiac Disease Resulting from a Gluten-Free Diet: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2019Pooled it
- Trial
- Prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders in children with celiac disease on different types of gluten-free diets.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Trial
- Gluten-Free Diet: Nutritional Strategies to Improve Eating Habits in Children with Celiac Disease: A Prospective, Single-arm Intervention Study.Nutrients · 2021Trial
- Impact of FODMAP Content Restrictions on the Quality of Diet for Patients with Celiac Disease on a Gluten-Free Diet.Nutrients · 2019Trial
- Exposure to Different Amounts of Dietary Gluten in Patients with Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS): An Exploratory Study.Nutrients · 2019Trial
- Trial
- "Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Observational
- Meta-analysis of the effect of the gluten-free diet on the lipid profile of patients with celiac disease.BMC nutrition · 2026Article
- Unraveling the Complexity of Celiac Disease: A Narrative Review of Its Multisystem Nature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Impact of Mediterranean diet-based nutritional intervention on gluten-free diet, nutritional status, and quality of life in a pediatric celiac population: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Beyond celiac disease: the potential role of gluten in Hashimoto's thyroiditis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Living Gluten-Free in Romania: A National Cross-Sectional Study of Dietary Adherence in Clinically Diagnosed and Self-Reported Cases.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Celiac disease in children with focus on symptoms and quality of life.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Physicochemical and Rheological Properties of Floury Rice Powder with Different Particle Sizes: Effects on Gluten-Free Sponge Cake Qualities.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Is There a Future Without Gluten Restrictions for Celiac Patients? Update on Current Treatments.Nutrients · 2025Review
44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe only effective and safe treatment of celiac disease (CD) continues being strict exclusion of gluten for life, the so-called gluten-free diet (GFD). Although this treatment is highly successful, following strict GFD poses difficulties to patients in family, social and working contexts, deteriorating his/her quality of life. We aimed to review main characteristics of GFD with special emphasis on factors that may interfere with adherence to it.
methodsWe conducted a search of various databases, such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Scielo, with focus on key words such as "gluten-free diet", "celiac disease", "gluten" and "gluten-free diet adherence". Available literature has not reached definitive conclusions on the exact amount of gluten that is harmless to celiac patients, although international agreements establish cutoff points for gluten-free products and advise the use of clinical assessment to tailor the diet according to individual needs. Following GFD must include eliminating gluten as ingredient as well as hidden component and potential cross contamination in foods. There are numerous grains to substitute wheat but composition of most gluten-free products tends to include only a small number of them, especially rice. The diet must be not only free of gluten but also healthy to avoid nutrient, vitamins and minerals deficiencies or excess. Overweight/obesity frequency has increased among celiac patients so weight gain deserves attention during follow up. Nutritional education by a trained nutritionist is of great relevance to achieve long-term satisfactory health status and good compliance.
conclusionsA balanced GFD should be based on a combination of naturally gluten-free foods and certified processed gluten-free products. How to measure and improve adherence to GFD is still controversial and deserves further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.