Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27334144›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Integration of research and practice to improve public health and healthcare delivery through a collaborative 'Health Integration Team' model - a qualitative investigation.

Sabi Redwood, Emer Brangan, Verity Leach, Jeremy Horwood, Jenny L Donovan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sabi RedwoodSchool of Social & Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK. sabi.redwood@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2159-1482
Emer BranganSchool of Social & Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Verity LeachSchool of Social & Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Jeremy HorwoodSchool of Social & Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Jenny L DonovanSchool of Social & Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
National Institute for Health Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEconomic considerations and the requirement to ensure the quality, safety and integration of research with health and social care provision have given rise to local developments of collaborative organisational forms and strategies to span the translational gaps. One such model - the Health Integration Team (HIT) model in Bristol in the United Kingdom (UK) - brings together National Health Service (NHS) organisations, universities, local authorities, patients and the public to facilitate the systematic application of evidence to promote integration across healthcare pathways. This study aimed to (1) provide empirical evidence documenting the evolution of the model; (2) to identify the social and organisational processes and theory of change underlying healthcare knowledge and practice; and (3) elucidate the key aspects of the HIT model for future development and translation to other localities.

methodsContemporaneous documents were analysed, using procedures associated with Framework Analysis to produce summarised data for descriptive accounts. In-depth interviews were undertaken with key informants and analysed thematically. Comparative methods were applied to further analyse the two data sets.

resultsOne hundred forty documents were analysed and 10 interviews conducted with individuals in leadership positions in the universities, NHS commissioning and provider organisations involved in the design and implementation of the HIT model. Data coalesced around four overarching themes: 'Whole system' engagement, requiring the active recruitment of all those who have a stake in the area of practice being considered, and 'collaboration' to enable coproduction were identified as 'process' themes. System-level integration and innovation were identified as potential 'outcomes' with far-reaching impacts on population health and service delivery.

conclusionThe HIT model emerged as a particular response to the perceived need for integration of research and practice to improve public health and healthcare delivery at a time of considerable organisational turmoil and financial constraints. The concept gained momentum and will likely be of interest to those involved in setting up similar arrangements, and researchers in the social and implementation sciences with an interest in their evaluation.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsCooperative BehaviorDelivery of Health CareHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services ResearchHumansLeadershipModels, TheoreticalPublic HealthResearch PersonnelState MedicineUnited KingdomCoproduction of healthcare knowledge and practiceIntegrated knowledge translationResearch and healthcare collaborations

Identifiers

PMID27334144
PMCPMC4918022
OpenAlexW2463398091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.