SynthesisClinical neuroradiology2018
The Neuroradiological Spectra of Adult and Pediatric Medulloblastoma Differ : Results from a Literature-based Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinicopathological insights of supratentorial embryonal tumor with medulloblastoma-like histopathology in adulthood: A case report.Biomedical reports · 2025Article
- Updates on Management of Adult Medulloblastoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2019Review
- Adult-onset medulloblastoma presenting as slow-growing, atypical mass: a case report.BJR case reports · 2017Article
- Clinical characterization of adult medulloblastoma and the effect of first-line therapies on outcome; The MD Anderson Cancer Center experience.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCurrent knowledge on the spectrum of the neuroradiological appearance of adult medulloblastoma is sparse. Due to the rarity of the disease, adult patients were generally diagnosed and treated similar to children; however, pediatric and adult medulloblastomas display substantial molecular differences that may influence the neuroradiological phenotype. This study therefore aimed at assessment of the neuroradiological spectrum of adult medulloblastoma in comparison to pediatric tumors.
methodsAll available publications on adult medulloblastoma published until June 2013 were screened for imaging data on single patients. A total of 109 patients were identified and compared to 118 pediatric patients described in 4 cohorts.
resultsThe average age of the adult patients was 34.3 years. Most adult medulloblastomas (57.6 %) were localized laterally (vs. 14.4 % in pediatric patients). On T1-weighted sequences, only 41.1 % of all adult medulloblastomas appeared hypointense (vs. 89.3 %) and 69.6 % were hyperintense on T2 sequences (vs. 83 %). In contrast to pediatric patients only 53.3 % showed strong contrast enhancement (pediatric patients 77.1 %), while the contrast uptake of the remainder was described as subtle, moderate or lacking. Contrast enhancement was more often described as inhomogeneous in adults (35.5 % as compared to 15.2 % in children) and 26.4 % had cysts.
conclusionAlthough the neuroradiological spectrum of medulloblastoma in adults was similar to children, an atypical presentation with inhomogeneous contrast enhancement, more hyperintense signal on T1 and a more hypointense signal on T2-weighted sequences was common. Given the rarity of the tumor, awareness of these differences constitutes a prerequisite to avoid delays in diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.