Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27334013›Full record

ReviewCancer medicine2016

Oral mucosal injury caused by mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors: emerging perspectives on pathobiology and impact on clinical practice.

Douglas E Peterson, Joyce A O'Shaughnessy, Hope S Rugo, Sharon Elad, Mark M Schubert, Chi T Viet, Cynthia Campbell-Baird, Jan Hronek, Virginia Seery, Josephine Divers and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Dermatological Complications After Solid Organ Transplantation.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Douglas E PetersonSchool of Dental Medicine and Neag Comprehensive Cancer Center, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut.
Joyce A O'ShaughnessyTexas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas.
Hope S RugoUCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California.
Sharon EladEastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Mark M SchubertSchool of Dentistry, University of Washington and Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington.
Chi T VietNew York University College of Dentistry, New York, New York.
Cynthia Campbell-BairdPenn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Jan HronekTennessee Oncology/Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tennessee.
Virginia SeeryBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Josephine DiversTexas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas.
John GlaspyJonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA, Los Angeles, California.
Brian L SchmidtNew York University College of Dentistry, New York, New York.
Timothy F MeillerSchool of Dentistry and the Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
New York University · USTexas Oncology · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USTennessee Oncology · USUCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterUConn Health · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years oral mucosal injury has been increasingly recognized as an important toxicity associated with mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, including in patients with breast cancer who are receiving everolimus. This review addresses the state-of-the-science regarding mTOR inhibitor-associated stomatitis (mIAS), and delineates its clinical characteristics and management. Given the clinically impactful pain associated with mIAS, this review also specifically highlights new research focusing on the study of the molecular basis of pain. The incidence of mIAS varies widely (2-78%). As reported across multiple mTOR inhibitor clinical trials, grade 3/4 toxicity occurs in up to 9% of patients. Managing mTOR-associated oral lesions with topical oral, intralesional, and/or systemic steroids can be beneficial, in contrast to the lack of evidence supporting steroid treatment of oral mucositis caused by high-dose chemotherapy or radiation. However, steroid management is not uniformly efficacious in all patients receiving mTOR inhibitors. Furthermore, technology does not presently exist to permit clinicians to predict a priori which of their patients will develop these lesions. There thus remains a strategic need to define the pathobiology of mIAS, the molecular basis of pain, and risk prediction relative to development of the clinical lesion. This knowledge could lead to novel future interventions designed to more effectively prevent mIAS and improve pain management if clinically significant mIAS lesions develop.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIncidencePainStomatitisTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesAntineoplastic AgentsMTOR protein, humanTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesmTOR inhibitororal mucosal injuryoral mucositisstomatitis

Identifiers

PMID27334013
PMCPMC4971919
OpenAlexW2469222194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.