Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27334010›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2016

Relationship between anxiety level and radiological investigation. Comparison among different diagnostic imaging exams in a prospective single-center study.

Giuseppe Lo Re, Rossella De Luca, Filippa Muscarneri, Patrizia Dorangricchia, Dario Picone, Federica Vernuccio, Sergio Salerno, Giuseppe La Tona, Antonio Pinto, Massimo Midiri and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Humor in radiological breast cancer screening: a way of improving patient service?Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Journal of evidence-based integrative medicine
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Swallowing evaluation with videofluoroscopy in the paediatric population.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giuseppe Lo ReSection of Radiology-Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Rossella De LucaDipartimento di discipline chirurgiche Oncologiche e stomatologiche, DICHIRONS, University of Palermo, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Via Liborio Giuffrè 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Filippa MuscarneriSection of Radiology-Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Patrizia DorangricchiaSection of Radiology-Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Dario PiconeSection of Radiology-Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy. dariopicone@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6719-7969
Federica VernuccioSection of Radiology-Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Sergio SalernoSection of Radiology-Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Giuseppe La TonaSection of Radiology-Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Antonio PintoUnità operative a Struttura Complessa di Radiologia Generale e di Pronto Soccorso, A.O.R.N. "A. Cardarelli", Naples, Italy.
Massimo MidiriSection of Radiology-Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Antonio RussoDipartimento di discipline chirurgiche Oncologiche e stomatologiche, DICHIRONS, University of Palermo, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Via Liborio Giuffrè 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Roberto LagallaSection of Radiology-Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Via del Vespro 129, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Giuseppe CiceroDipartimento di discipline chirurgiche Oncologiche e stomatologiche, DICHIRONS, University of Palermo, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Via Liborio Giuffrè 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "Paolo Giaccone" di Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvery patient could feel anxious when he waits in a radiological department to undergo diagnostic exams. The aim of our study is to evaluate the impact of the radiological exams on patient anxiety. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe evaluated 343 patients (mean age 54.83 years) who underwent different types of diagnostic exams in the Department of Diagnostic Imaging at our Hospital from April 2013 to August 2014. We administered to patients the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory Test, which detected with high sensitivity both state anxiety and trait anxiety. A team of clinical psychologists and radiologists evaluated the scores obtained.

results83 out of 343 patients were excluded because refused to file the questionnaire. 31 % of the patients were submitted to MR, 18 % to breast imaging, 10 % to X-ray, 22 % Computer Tomography and 19 % to ultrasound, as previously described. 41 % of patients were submitted to the examination because of an oncologic disease, while 59 % because of non-oncological disease. Therefore, it was found that high levels of anxiety were present in most (about 91 %) of the patients and the scores varied according to the imaging examination and to the examination's reason: anxiety level was higher in non-oncological patients (54 %) and in patients waiting to undergo to MRI exams (29 %).

conclusionOur data suggest that the diagnostic exams are stressful events for the patient, also in non-oncological patients. So, it is important to adequate the radiological staff to receive the patient, to inform him and perform exams with emotive involvement with a targeted education. Also, further studies are needed to evaluate the anxiety level and the quality of the images, because the anxiety can result in a somatic disorder with hyperactivity of the autonomic nervous system which may affect the patient's physical examination, causing problems in the evaluation of radiological images making to non-cooperative patient. MRI imaging is the examination that more of all led to an anxious state of patients but the main stressor is not related to the type of diagnostic examination, but to the uncertainty of the diagnosis, therapy and prognosis.

Indexed as

AdultAnxietyDiagnostic ImagingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesAnxietyDiagnostic imagingOncologyQuality of lifeSocial supportSTAI

Identifiers

PMID27334010
OpenAlexW2473647800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.