ArticleLa Radiologia medica2016
Flat detector cone-beam CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of mediastinal lesions: preliminary experience.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic outcome and safety of CT-guided core needle biopsy for mediastinal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2020Pooled it
- Percutaneous CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Core Needle Biopsy of Mediastinal Masses: Technical Outcome and Complications of 155 Procedures during a 10-Year Period.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Percutaneous bone biopsy using a flat-panel cone beam computed tomography virtual navigation system.Saudi medical journal · 2018Article
- Flat detector cone beam CT-guided nephrostomy using virtual navigation in patients with iatrogenic ureteral injury.La Radiologia medica · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of flat detector cone-beam CT-guided CBCT percutaneous needle biopsy (PNB) of mediastinal lesions.
methodsA total of 100 patients with 100 solid mediastinal lesions were retrospectively enrolled to undergo percutaneous needle biopsy (PNB) procedures. The mean diameter of lesions was 4.4 ± 1.8 cm (range 1.8-9.0 cm). The needle path was carefully planned and calculated on the CBCT virtual navigation guidance system, which acquired 3D CT-like cross-sectional images. Diagnostic performance, procedure details, complication rate, and patient radiation exposure were investigated.
resultsThe technical success rate of PNB under CBCT virtual navigation system was 100 % (100/100). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PNB of small nodules under iGuide CBCT virtual navigation guidance were 95.1 % (79/83), 100 % (12/12), and 95.7 % (91/95), respectively. The number of biopsies and CBCT acquisitions were 2.6 ± 1.2 (range 1-6) and 3.0 ± 1.1 (range 2-8), respectively. Complications occurred in five (5.0 %) cases. The mean total procedure time was 11.70 ± 3.44 min (range 6-27 min), resulting in a mean exposure dose of 9.7 ± 4.3 mSv.
conclusionFlat detector cone-beam CT-guided PNB is an accurate and safe diagnostic method for mediastinal lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.