Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27333937›Full record

ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2016

Quantitative T

Michael J Knight, Bryony McCann, Demitra Tsivos, Elizabeth Couthard, Risto A Kauppinen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Metabolite TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Metabolite TbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael J KnightSchool of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, 12a Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK. mk13005@bristol.ac.uk.
Bryony McCannSchool of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, 12a Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK.
Demitra TsivosInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Level 1 Learning and Research Building, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
Elizabeth CouthardInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Level 1 Learning and Research Building, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
Risto A KauppinenSchool of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, 12a Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to examine age-dependent changes in both T

methodsA total of 37 participants between the ages of 49 and 87 years old were scanned with a 3 Tesla system, using T

resultsThe T

conclusionsChanges in T

Indexed as

AgingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrainCohort StudiesContrast MediaFemaleHippocampusHumansMaleMiddle AgedSignal-To-Noise RatioWhite MatterContrast MediaBrainContrast-to-noise ratioDephasingGray matterT2 relaxationWhite matter

Identifiers

PMID27333937
PMCPMC5124042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.