Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27333465›Full record

Trial reportMinimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy2016

Surgeons' assessment of internal anal sphincter nerve supply during TaTME - inbetween expectations and reality.

Werner Kneist, Laura Hanke, Daniel W Kauff, Hauke Lang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02943694 (The Feasibility and Safety of Instruments in Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02943694 phase1 / phase2unknown statusnot on this map

The Feasibility and Safety of Instruments in Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (TaTME) for Rectal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorRuijin HospitalRan2016 to 2018Enrolled32ConditionsPostoperative ComplicationsArmsTaTME with CS-Compact (GelPoint pathway)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Robot-guided neuromapping during nerve-sparing taTME for low rectal cancer.International journal of colorectal disease · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. [Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for primary rectal cancer : Video article].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. [Minimally invasive approaches for transanal surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Werner Kneista Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery , University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz , Mainz , Germany.
Laura Hankea Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery , University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz , Mainz , Germany.
Daniel W Kauffa Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery , University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz , Mainz , Germany.
Hauke Langa Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery , University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz , Mainz , Germany.
University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraoperative identification of nerve fibers heading from the inferior rectal plexus (IRP) to the internal anal sphincter (IAS) is challenging. The transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is said to better preserve pelvic autonomic nerves. The aim of this study was to investigate the nerve identification rates during TaTME by transanal visual and electrophysiological assessment. MATERIAL AND

methodsA total of 52 patients underwent TaTME for malignant conditions. The IRP with its posterior branches to the IAS and the pelvic splanchnic nerves (PSN) were visually assessed in 20 patients (v-TaTME). Electrophysiological nerve identification was performed in 32 patients using electric stimulation under processed electromyography of IAS (e-TaTME).

resultsThe indication profile for TaTME was comparable between the v-TaTME and the e-TaTME group. The identification of IRP was more meaningful under electrophysiological assessment than under visual assessment for the left pelvic side (81% vs. 45%, p = 0.008) as well as the right pelvic side (78% vs. 45%, p = 0.016). The identification rates for PSN did not significantly differ between both groups, respectively (81% vs. 75%, p = 0.420 and 84% vs. 70%, p = 0.187).

conclusionsThe transanal approach facilitated visual identification of IAS nerve supply. In combination with electrophysiological nerve assessment the identification rate almost doubled. For further insights functional data are needed.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnal CanalComorbidityFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedRectal NeoplasmsRisk FactorsSex FactorsTransanal Endoscopic Surgeryautonomic nervesRectal cancerTaTMEtotal mesorectal excisiontransanal surgery

Identifiers

PMID27333465
PMCPMC5044775
OpenAlexW2466235023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.