Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27333269›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2016

Natural Language Processing to Assess Documentation of Features of Critical Illness in Discharge Documents of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Survivors.

Gary E Weissman, Michael O Harhay, Ricardo M Lugo, Barry D Fuchs, Scott D Halpern, Mark E Mikkelsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. [S3 guideline on sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care-update 2025].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gary E Weissman1 Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-9588-3819
Michael O Harhay2 Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, and.
Ricardo M Lugo4 Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Barry D Fuchs1 Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.
Scott D Halpern1 Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.
Mark E Mikkelsen1 Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.

Funding

Training in Critical Care Health Policy ResearchT32HL098054 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Scott D Halpern · 2010 to 2026
$8.2M
Methods to improve the detection of treatment effects in ARDS clinical trialsF31HL127947 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HARHAY, MICHAEL OSCAR · 2015 to 2016
$71k
NHLBI NIH HHS F31 HL127947NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleTransitions to outpatient care are crucial after critical illness, but the documentation practices in discharge documents after critical illness are unknown.

objectivesTo characterize the rates of documentation of various features of critical illness in discharge documents of patients diagnosed with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) during their hospital stay.

methodsWe used natural language processing tools to build a keyword-based classifier that categorizes discharge documents by presence of terms from four groups of keywords related to critical illness. We used a multivariable modified Poisson regression model to infer patient- and hospital-level characteristics associated with documentation of relevant keywords. A manual chart review was used to validate the accuracy of the keyword-based classifier, and to assess for ARDS documentation during the hospital stay. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsOf 815 discharge documents, ARDS was identified in only 111 (13%). Mechanical ventilation was identified in 770 (92%) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission in 693 (83%) of discharge documents. Symptoms or recommendations related to post-intensive care syndrome were included in 306 (38%) of discharge documents. Patient age (older; relative risk [RR] = 0.97/yr, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.96-0.98) and higher PaO2:FiO2 (decreasing illness severity; RR = 0.96/10-unit increment, 95% CI = 0.93-0.98) were associated with decreased documentation of ARDS. Being discharged from a surgical (RR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.22-0.50) compared with a medicine service was also associated with decreased rates of ARDS documentation. The manual chart review revealed 98% concordance between ARDS documentation in the discharge summary and during the hospital stay. Accuracy of the document classifier was 100% for ARDS and mechanical ventilation, 98% for ICU admission, and 95% for symptoms of post-intensive care syndrome.

conclusionsIn the discharge documents of survivors of ARDS, ARDS itself is rarely mentioned, but mechanical ventilation and ICU stay frequently are. The low rates of documentation of ARDS appear to be concordant with low rates of documentation during the hospital stay, consistent with known underrecognition in the ICU. Natural language processing tools can be used to effectively analyze large numbers of discharge documents of patients with critical illness.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingAgedCritical IllnessDocumentationFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleMedical InformaticsMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPatient DischargeRegression AnalysisRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress Syndromeacute respiratory distress syndromeclinical informaticscritical carepatient discharge

Identifiers

PMID27333269
PMCPMC5059499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.