Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27333049›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2016

Complement and Antibody-mediated Enhancement of Red Blood Cell Invasion and Growth of Malaria Parasites.

Sergei Biryukov, Evelina Angov, Mary E Landmesser, Michele D Spring, Christian F Ockenhouse, José A Stoute

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Complement receptor 1 is the human erythrocyte receptor forProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Naturally Acquired Antibodies againstPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Host-Malaria Parasite Interactions and Impacts on Mutual Evolution.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Malaria Parasites: The Great Escape.Frontiers in immunology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sergei BiryukovDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, United States.
Evelina AngovWalter Reed Army Institute of Research, Division of Malaria Vaccine Development, Silver Spring, MD 20910, United States.
Mary E LandmesserDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, United States; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, United States.
Michele D SpringWalter Reed Army Institute of Research, Division of Malaria Vaccine Development, Silver Spring, MD 20910, United States.
Christian F OckenhousePATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative, Washington, DC 20001, United States.
José A StouteDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, United States; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, United States. Electronic address: jstoute@psu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plasmodium falciparum malaria is a deadly pathogen. The invasion of red blood cells (RBCs) by merozoites is a target for vaccine development. Although anti-merozoite antibodies can block invasion in vitro, there is no efficacy in vivo. To explain this discrepancy we hypothesized that complement activation could enhance RBC invasion by binding to the complement receptor 1 (CR1). Here we show that a monoclonal antibody directed against the merozoite and human polyclonal IgG from merozoite vaccine recipients enhanced RBC invasion in a complement-dependent manner and that soluble CR1 inhibited this enhancement. Sialic acid-independent strains, that presumably are able to bind to CR1 via a native ligand, showed less complement-dependent enhancement of RBC invasion than sialic acid-dependent strains that do not utilize native CR1 ligands. Confocal fluorescent microscopy revealed that complement-dependent invasion resulted in aggregation of CR1 at the RBC surface in contact with the merozoite. Finally, total anti-P. berghei IgG enhanced parasite growth and C3 deficiency decreased parasite growth in mice. These results demonstrate, contrary to current views, that complement activation in conjunction with antibodies can paradoxically aid parasites invade RBCs and should be considered in future design and testing of merozoite vaccines.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalCell AdhesionCells, CulturedErythrocytesFlow CytometryHumansImmunoglobulin GMalariaMerozoitesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicroscopy, ConfocalParasitemiaPlasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsAntibodies, MonoclonalImmunoglobulin GProtozoan ProteinsProtozoan VaccinesReceptors, ComplementComplementCR1MalariaMerozoitesRed blood cells

Identifiers

PMID27333049
PMCPMC4972486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.