Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27332998›Full record

ArticleNano letters2016

Measurement of DNA Translocation Dynamics in a Solid-State Nanopore at 100 ns Temporal Resolution.

Siddharth Shekar, David J Niedzwiecki, Chen-Chi Chien, Peijie Ong, Daniel A Fleischer, Jianxun Lin, Jacob K Rosenstein, Marija Drndić, Kenneth L Shepard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nano letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. On-chip trace detection of CdCommunications engineering · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Solid-State Nanopores for Biomolecular Analysis and Detection.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Localized Nanopore Fabrication via Controlled Breakdown.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Siddharth ShekarDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University , New York, New York 10027, United States.
David J NiedzwieckiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
Chen-Chi ChienDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
Peijie OngDepartment of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University , New York, New York 10027, United States.
Daniel A FleischerDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University , New York, New York 10027, United States.
Jianxun LinBGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Jacob K RosensteinSchool of Engineering, Brown University , Providence, Rhode Island 02912, United States.
Marija DrndićDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.
Kenneth L ShepardDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University , New York, New York 10027, United States.

Funding

Single Molecule Real Time Electronic SequencingR01HG006882 · NHGRI · INTEL LABS · PI LEMAY, SERGE GUY, SHEPARD, KENNETH L · 2012 to 2015
$5.0M
Studies of Riboswitch-Mediated Transcriptional Control Using Single-Molecule FielR01GM107417 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI GONZALEZ, RUBEN L, NUCKOLLS, COLIN P · 2014 to 2017
$1.5M
Integrated, multiplexed high-frequency electronic analysis of DNA in nanoporesR01HG006879 · NHGRI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI SHEPARD, KENNETH L · 2012 to 2014
$1.4M
Enzyme-less DNA base discrimination using solid-state nanopores with high-frequency integrated detection electronicsR01HG009189 · NHGRI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI DRNDIC, MARIJA, SHEPARD, KENNETH L · 2016 to 2018
$1.2M
High-bandwidth DNA sequencing using graphene nanoribbon-nanopore devicesR21HG007856 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DRNDIC, MARIJA · 2014 to 2015
$862k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006879NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006882NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG009189NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG007856NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the potential for nanopores to be a platform for high-bandwidth study of single-molecule systems, ionic current measurements through nanopores have been limited in their temporal resolution by noise arising from poorly optimized measurement electronics and large parasitic capacitances in the nanopore membranes. Here, we present a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) nanopore (CNP) amplifier capable of low noise recordings at an unprecedented 10 MHz bandwidth. When integrated with state-of-the-art solid-state nanopores in silicon nitride membranes, we achieve an SNR of greater than 10 for ssDNA translocations at a measurement bandwidth of 5 MHz, which represents the fastest ion current recordings through nanopores reported to date. We observe transient features in ssDNA translocation events that are as short as 200 ns, which are hidden even at bandwidths as high as 1 MHz. These features offer further insights into the translocation kinetics of molecules entering and exiting the pore. This platform highlights the advantages of high-bandwidth translocation measurements made possible by integrating nanopores and custom-designed electronics.

Indexed as

NanoporesSemiconductorsDNA, Single-StrandedNanotechnologyDNA, Single-StrandedCMOSDNAhigh bandwidthlow noise amplifierNanopore

Identifiers

PMID27332998
PMCPMC5312517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.