Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27332772›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica2016

Fluorescent membrane markers elucidate the association of Borrelia burgdorferi with tick cell lines.

R C Teixeira, B A Baêta, J S Ferreira, R C Medeiros, C M Maya-Monteiro, F A Lara, L Bell-Sakyi, A H Fonseca

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

R C TeixeiraUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias, Instituto de Veterinária, Seropédica, RJ , Brasil, Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias, Instituto de Veterinária, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, RJ, Brasil.
B A BaêtaUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias, Instituto de Veterinária, Seropédica, RJ , Brasil, Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias, Instituto de Veterinária, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, RJ, Brasil.
J S FerreiraFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ , Brasil, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
R C MedeirosFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ , Brasil, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
C M Maya-MonteiroFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ , Brasil, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
F A LaraFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ , Brasil, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
L Bell-SakyiThe Pirbright Institute, The Pirbright Institute, The Tick Cell Biobank, Pirbright , UK, The Tick Cell Biobank, The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, UK.
A H FonsecaUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias, Instituto de Veterinária, Seropédica, RJ , Brasil, Laboratório de Doenças Parasitárias, Instituto de Veterinária, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro · BRThe Pirbright Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the association of Borrelia burgdorferi s.s. with ixodid tick cell lines by flow cytometry and fluorescence and confocal microscopy. Spirochetes were stained with a fluorescent membrane marker (PKH67 or PKH26), inoculated into 8 different tick cell lines and incubated at 30°C for 24 h. PKH efficiently stained B. burgdorferi without affecting bacterial viability or motility. Among the tick cell lines tested, the Rhipicephalus appendiculatus cell line RA243 achieved the highest percentage of association/internalization, with both high (90%) and low (10%) concentrations of BSK-H medium in tick cell culture medium. Treatment with cytochalasin D dramatically reduced the average percentage of cells with internalized spirochetes, which passed through a dramatic morphological change during their internalization by the host cell as observed in time-lapse photography. Almost all of the fluorescent bacteria were seen to be inside the tick cells. PKH labeling of borreliae proved to be a reliable and valuable tool to analyze the association of spirochetes with host cells by flow cytometry, confocal and fluorescence microscopy.

Indexed as

Borrelia burgdorferiAnimalsCell LineCells, CulturedCulture MediaFlow CytometryFluorescent DyesMicroscopy, ConfocalOrganic ChemicalsPhagocytosisReproducibility of ResultsSpirochaetalesStaining and LabelingTick-Borne DiseasesTicksTime FactorsCulture MediaFluorescent DyesOrganic ChemicalsPKH 26PKH67

Identifiers

PMID27332772
PMCPMC4918789
OpenAlexW2434038410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.