Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27332120›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2016

Conformational and Thermodynamic Landscape of GPCR Activation from Theory and Computation.

Sijia S Dong, William A Goddard, Ravinder Abrol

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fully activated structure of the sterol-bound Smoothened GPCR-Gi protein complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The atomistic level structure for the activated human κ-opioid receptor bound to the full Gi protein and the MP1104 agonist.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sijia S DongMaterials and Process Simulation Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.
William A GoddardMaterials and Process Simulation Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California. Electronic address: wag@wag.caltech.edu.
Ravinder AbrolMaterials and Process Simulation Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California; Department of Biomedical Sciences and Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: abrolr@csmc.edu.
California Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Brain Endothelial Receptor for E. coliR01AI040567 · NIAID · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI DAVIS, MARK E, GODDARD, WILLIAM ANDREW · 2001 to 2015
$5.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI040567
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a hybrid computational methodology to predict multiple energetically accessible conformations for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that might play a role in binding to ligands and different signaling partners. To our knowledge, this method, termed ActiveGEnSeMBLE, enables the first quantitative energy profile for GPCR activation that is consistent with the qualitative profile deduced from experiments. ActiveGEnSeMBLE starts with a systematic coarse grid sampling of helix tilts/rotations (∼13 trillion transmembrane-domain conformations) and selects the conformational landscape based on energy. This profile identifies multiple potential active-state energy wells, with the TM3-TM6 intracellular distance as an approximate activation coordinate. These energy wells are then sampled locally using a finer grid to find locally minimized conformation in each energy well. We validate this strategy using the inactive and active experimental structures of β2 adrenergic receptor (hβ2AR) and M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Structures of membrane-embedded hβ2AR along its activation coordinate are subjected to molecular-dynamics simulations for relaxation and interaction energy analysis to generate a quantitative energy landscape for hβ2AR activation. This landscape reveals several metastable states along this coordinate, indicating that for hβ2AR, the agonist alone is not enough to stabilize the active state and that the G protein is necessary, consistent with experimental observations. The method's application to somatostatin receptor SSTR5 (no experimental structure available) shows that to predict an active conformation it is better to start from an inactive structure template based on a close homolog than to start from an active template based on a distant homolog. The energy landscape for hSSTR5 activation is consistent with hβ2AR in the role of the G protein. These results demonstrate the utility of the ActiveGEnSeMBLE method for predicting multiple conformations along the pathways for activating GPCRs and the corresponding energy landscapes, thereby providing detailed structural insights into the initial molecular events of GPCR function that are not easily accessible by experiments.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, MolecularAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsHumansMonte Carlo MethodProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein StabilityProtein Structure, SecondaryReceptor, Muscarinic M2Receptors, Adrenergic, beta-2Receptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, SomatostatinRotationThermodynamicsAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsReceptor, Muscarinic M2Receptors, Adrenergic, beta-2Receptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, Somatostatinsomatostatin receptor 5

Identifiers

PMID27332120
PMCPMC4919603
OpenAlexW2470129929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.