Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27331778›Full record

ArticleAnesthesia and analgesia2016

Contrasting Effects of the γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor β3 Subunit N265M Mutation on Loss of Righting Reflexes Induced by Etomidate and the Novel Anesthetic Barbiturate R-mTFD-MPAB.

Corey A Amlong, Mark G Perkins, Timothy T Houle, Keith W Miller, Robert A Pearce

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Comparison of Ketamine or Etomidate Combined with Xylazine for Intraperitoneal Anesthesia in Four Mouse Strains.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020
    Article
  3. Binding site location on GABABritish journal of pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Corey A AmlongFrom the *Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin; and †Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mark G Perkins
Timothy T Houle
Keith W Miller
Robert A Pearce
Massachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Synthetic Chemistry CoreP01GM058448 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MILLER, KEITH W · 1999 to 2018
$33.6M
XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE ANALYSIS: PROTEIN SORTINGP41RR001081 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FERRIN, THOMAS E · 1985 to 2011
$17.6M
Anesthetic Suppression of Memory through disinhibitory circuits in HippocampusR01GM118801 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PEARCE, ROBERT A · 2016 to 2019
$1.9M
Inhaled Anesthestic Modulation of Hippocampal CircuitsR01GM101497 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PEARCE, ROBERT A · 2011 to 2014
$1.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR001081NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM058448NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101497NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM118801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have shown that etomidate modulates γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors by binding at the β-α subunit interface within the transmembrane domain of receptors that incorporate β2 or β3 subunits. Introducing an asparagine-to-methionine (N265M) mutation at position 265 of the β3 subunit, which sits within the etomidate-binding site, attenuates the hypnotic effect of etomidate in vivo. It was reported recently that the photoactivatable barbiturate R-mTFD-MPAB also acts on γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors primarily by binding to a homologous site at the γ-β interface. Given this difference in drug-binding sites established by the in vitro experiments, we hypothesized that the β3-N265M-mutant mice would not be resistant to the anesthetic effects of R-mTFD-MPAB in vivo, whereas the same mutant mice would be resistant to the anesthetic effects of R-etomidate.

methodsWe measured the effects of IV injection of etomidate and R-mTFD-MPAB on loss and recovery of righting reflex in wild-type mice and in mice carrying the β3-N265M mutation.

resultsEtomidate-induced hypnosis, as measured by the duration of loss of righting reflex, was attenuated in the N265M knock-in mice, confirming prior results. By contrast, recovery of balance and coordinated movement, as measured by the ability to maintain all 4 paws on the ground, was unaffected by the mutation. Neither hypnosis nor impairment of coordinated movement produced by the barbiturate R-mTFD-MPAB was affected by the mutation.

conclusionsThe findings confirmed our hypothesis that mutating the etomidate-binding site would not alter the response to the barbiturate R-mTFD-MPAB. Furthermore, we confirmed previous studies indicating that etomidate-induced hypnosis is mediated in part by β3-containing receptors. We also extended previous findings by showing that etomidate-impaired balance and coordinated movement are not mediated by β3-containing receptors, thus implicating β2-containing receptors in this end point.

Indexed as

AnimalsBarbituratesBinding SitesDose-Response Relationship, DrugEtomidateFemaleHypnotics and SedativesMaleMiceMice, TransgenicMutationProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein SubunitsReceptors, GABA-AReflex, RightingBarbituratesbarbituric acidEtomidateHypnotics and SedativesProtein SubunitsReceptors, GABA-A

Identifiers

PMID27331778
PMCPMC5072997
OpenAlexW2470286410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.