Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27331619›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2016

Direct Investigation of Slow Correlated Dynamics in Proteins via Dipolar Interactions.

R Bryn Fenwick, Charles D Schwieters, Beat Vögeli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Using Cross-Correlated Spin Relaxation to Characterize Backbone Dihedral Angle Distributions of Flexible Protein Segments.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2021
    Article
  3. Protein Allostery at Atomic Resolution.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2020
    Article
  4. Distance-independent Cross-correlated Relaxation and Isotropic Chemical Shift Modulation in Protein Dynamics Studies.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2019
    Review
  5. Xplor-NIH for molecular structure determination from NMR and other data sources.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R Bryn FenwickInstitute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona) , Parc Científic de Barcelona, C/Baldiri Reixac 10, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Charles D SchwietersDivision of Computational Bioscience, Center for Information Technology, National Institutes of Health , Building 12A, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-5624, United States.
Beat VögeliLaboratory of Physical Chemistry, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH-Hönggerberg , Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

Biomedical ImagingZIACT000090 · CIT · CENTER FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY · PI TRUS, BENES L · 2009 to 2018
$7.8M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CT999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The synchronization of native state motions as they transition between microstates influences catalysis kinetics, mediates allosteric interactions, and reduces the conformational entropy of proteins. However, it has proven difficult to describe native microstates because they are usually minimally frustrated and may interconvert on the micro- to millisecond time scale. Direct observation of concerted equilibrium fluctuations would therefore be an important tool for describing protein native states. Here we propose a strategy that relates NMR cross-correlated relaxation (CCR) rates between dipolar interactions to residual dipolar couplings (RDCs) of individual consecutive H(N)-N and H(α)-C(α) bonds, which act as a proxy for the peptide planes and the side chains, respectively. Using Xplor-NIH ensemble structure calculations restrained with the RDC and CCR data, we observe collective motions on time scales slower than nanoseconds in the backbone for GB3. To directly access the correlations from CCR, we develop a structure-free data analysis. The resulting dynamic correlation map is consistent with the ensemble-restrained simulations and reveals a complex network. In general, we find that the bond motions are on average slightly correlated and that the local environment dominates many observations. Despite this, some patterns are typical over entire secondary structure elements. In the β-sheet, nearly all bonds are weakly correlated, and there is an approximately binary alternation in correlation intensity corresponding to the solvent exposure/shielding alternation of the side chains. For α-helices, there is also a weak correlation in the H(N)-N bonds. The degree of correlation involving H(α)-C(α) bonds is directly affected by side-chain fluctuations, whereas loops show complex and nonuniform behavior.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationKineticsNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProteinsSolventsProteinsSolvents

Identifiers

PMID27331619
PMCPMC5055379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.