Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27331000›Full record

ArticleGenomics data2016

Identification of differentially expressed genes in sexed pig embryos during post-hatching development in primiparous sows exposed to differing intermittent suckling and breeding strategies.

Stephen Tsoi, Milena Blanes, Tai Yuan Chen, Pieter Langendijk, Rebecca Athorn, George Foxcroft, Michael Dyck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics data, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Stephen TsoiDepartment of Agricultural, food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Milena BlanesDepartment of Agricultural, food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Tai Yuan ChenSouth Australian Research and Development Institute, Roseworthy Campus, Roseworthy, South Australia, Australia.
Pieter LangendijkTrouw Nutrition R&D, Veerstraat 38, 5830 AE Boxmeer, Netherlands.
Rebecca AthornRivalea Pty Ltd, Corowa, NSW, Australia.
George FoxcroftDepartment of Agricultural, food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Michael DyckDepartment of Agricultural, food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAFood & Nutrition · NLSouth Australian Research and Development Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of commercial pig breeding programs is to maximize the number of pigs produced per sow per year. Given that sows exhibit an estrus during lactation is a potential means of increasing productivity of a pig breeding herd without reducing in lactation length, conventionally, weaning of piglets at a relatively young age is often related to post-weaning piglet performance which compromises piglet welfare. Therefore, intermittent suckling (IS) is a management technique in which lactating sows are separated from their piglets for a fixed period of the days and allowing sows to continue nursing piglets while exhibiting estrus and being breed during lactation, thereby promoting both piglet well-being and sow reproductive performance [1]. For this study, primiparous sows (PP) were exposed to 28 day (D28) lactation with intermittent suckling (IS) during the final week prior to weaning. The sows detected to be in estrus during lactation were either bred at this first estrus (FE) during lactation (IS21FE), or were "skipped" and bred at their second estrus which occurred after final weaning at D28 (IS21SE). Despite the benefits of IS, the effects of the maternal physiology related to breeding during lactation on embryonic transcriptome are largely unknown. Recent advances in the ability to assess embryonic gene expression in both sexes have made these analyses possible. Here, we describe the experimental procedures of two color microarray analyses and annotation of differentially expressed (DE) genes in detail corresponding to data deposited at NCBI in the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE53576 and GSE73020 for day 9 embryos (D9E) and day 30 embryos (D30E) respectively. Although only a few DE genes were discovered between IS21FE and IS21SE in both sexes from D9E or D30E, the raw data are still valuable for future use to understand the gene expression profiling from two different developmental stages.

Indexed as

DevelopmentDifferential gene expressionEmbryoMicroarrayPCR sex typingPig

Identifiers

PMID27331000
PMCPMC4909839
OpenAlexW2415134345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.