Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27330971›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2016

Functional networks of motor inhibition in conversion disorder patients and feigning subjects.

Thomas Hassa, Esther de Jel, Oliver Tuescher, Roger Schmidt, Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Neuroimaging in Functional Movement Disorders.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas HassaLurija Institute for Rehabilitation and Health Sciences, Allensbach, Germany; Neurological Rehabilitation Center Kliniken Schmieder, Allensbach, Germany. Electronic address: t.hassa@kliniken-schmieder.de.
Esther de JelDepartment of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany.
Oliver TuescherDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany.
Roger SchmidtDepartment of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Germany; Department of Psychotherapeutic Neurology, Neurological Rehabilitation Center Kliniken Schmieder, Konstanz and Gailingen, Germany.
Mircea Ariel SchoenfeldNeurological Rehabilitation Center Kliniken Schmieder, Allensbach, Germany; Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Germany; Leibniz-Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural correlates of motor inhibition leading to paresis in conversion disorder are not well known. The key question is whether they are different of those of normal subjects feigning the symptoms. Thirteen conversion disorder patients with hemiparesis and twelve healthy controls were investigated using functional magnetic resonance tomography under conditions of passive motor stimulation of the paretic/feigned paretic and the non-paretic hand. Healthy controls were also investigated in a non-feigning condition. During passive movement of the affected right hand conversion disorder patients exhibited activations in the bilateral triangular part of the inferior frontal gyri (IFG), with a left side dominance compared to controls in non-feigning condition. Feigning controls revealed for the same condition a weak unilateral activation in the right triangular part of IFG and an activity decrease in frontal midline areas, which couldn't be observed in patients. The results suggest that motor inhibition in conversion disorder patients is mediated by the IFG that was also involved in inhibition processes in normal subjects. The activity pattern in feigning controls resembled that of conversion disorder patients but with a clear difference in the medial prefrontal cortex. Healthy controls showed decreased activity in this region during feigning compared to non-feigning conditions suggesting a reduced sense of self-agency during feigning. Remarkably, no activity differences could be observed in medial prefrontal cortex for patients vs healthy controls in feigning or non-feigning conditions suggesting self-agency related activity in patients to be in between those of non-feigning and feigning healthy subjects.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdultConversion DisorderFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImagery, PsychotherapyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMotor DisordersNeural PathwaysOxygenTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultOxygenConversion disorderFeigningfMRIMotor inhibitionMotor paresis

Identifiers

PMID27330971
PMCPMC4900693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.