ArticlePeerJ2016
Aberrant methylation of PCDH10 and RASSF1A genes in blood samples for non-invasive diagnosis and prognostic assessment of gastric cancer.
Article in PeerJ, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association Between Liquid Biopsy and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Pooled it
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2017Pooled it
- Early detection of gastric cancer via multiplex blood assay targeting CfDNA methylation signatures.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026Article
- SFRP2 and RPRM as methylation based serum biomarkers for the detection of gastric cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Liquid biopsy in gastric cancer: A snapshot of the current state of the art.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- A dual-gene panel of two fragments of methylated IRF4 and one of ZEB2 in plasma cell-free DNA for gastric cancer detection.Epigenetics · 2024Article
- Epigenetic reprogramming in gastrointestinal cancer: biology and translational perspectives.MedComm · 2024Review
- DNA methylation drives a new path in gastric cancer early detection: Current impact and prospects.Genes & diseases · 2024Review
- Clinical applications and perspectives of circulating tumor DNA in gastric cancer.Cancer cell international · 2024Review
- Research on the signaling pathway and the related mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine intervention in chronic gastritis of the "inflammation-cancer transformation".Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Global progress and future prospects of early gastric cancer screening.Journal of Cancer · 2024Review
- Cell-free Nucleic Acid as Promising Diagnostic Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review.Journal of Cancer · 2024Article
- Landscape of Innovative Methods for Early Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The role of Pcdh10 in neurological disease and cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Review
- An overview of DNA methylation markers for early detection of gastric cancer: current status, challenges, and prospects.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- Liquid biopsy in gastric cancer: predictive and prognostic biomarkers.Cell death & disease · 2022Review
- Biomarkers of gastric cancer: current advancement.Heliyon · 2022Review
- The relationship between P16Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Gastric cancer: An epigenetic view.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022Review
- Correlation betweenJournal of oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background. Assessment of DNA methylation of specific genes is one approach to the diagnosis of cancer worldwide. Early stage detection is necessary to reduce the mortality rate of cancers, including those occurring in the stomach. For this purpose, tumor cells in circulating blood offer promising candidates for non-invasive diagnosis. Transcriptional inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, like PCDH10 and RASSF1A, by methylation is associated with progression of gastric cancer, and such methylation can therefore be utilized as a biomarker. Methods. The present research was conducted to evaluate DNA methylation in these two genes using blood samples of gastric cancer cases. Clinicopathological data were also analyzed and cumulative survival rates generated for comparison. Results. High frequencies of PCDH10 and RASSF1A methylations in the gastric cancer group were noted (94.1% and 83.2%, respectively, as compared to 2.97% and 5.45% in 202 matched controls). Most patients (53.4%) were in severe stage of the disease, with a median survival time of 8.4 months after diagnosis. Likewise, the patients with metastases, or RASSF1A and PCDH10 methylations, had median survival times of 7.3, 7.8, and 8.4 months, respectively. A Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that cumulative survival was significantly lower in those cases positive for methylation of RASSF1A than in their negative counterparts. Similarly, whereas almost 100% of patients positive for PCDH10 methylation had died after five years, none of the negative cases died over this period. Notably, the methylations of RASSF1A and PCDH10 were found to be higher in the late-stage patients and were also significantly correlated with metastasis and histology. Conclusions. PCDH10 and RASSF1A methylations in blood samples can serve as potential non-invasive diagnostic indicators in blood for gastric cancer. In addition to RASSF1A methylation, tumor stage proved to be a major prognostic factor in terms of survival rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.