Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27330867›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2016

Aberrant methylation of PCDH10 and RASSF1A genes in blood samples for non-invasive diagnosis and prognostic assessment of gastric cancer.

Charinya Pimson, Tipaya Ekalaksananan, Chamsai Pientong, Supannee Promthet, Nuntiput Putthanachote, Krittika Suwanrungruang, Surapon Wiangnon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Early detection of gastric cancer via multiplex blood assay targeting CfDNA methylation signatures.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The role of Pcdh10 in neurological disease and cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. The relationship between P16Scientific reports · 2022
    Article
  19. Gastric cancer: An epigenetic view.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022
    Review
  20. Correlation betweenJournal of oncology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charinya PimsonBiomedical Science Programme, Graduate School, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Tipaya EkalaksanananDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University,Khon Kaen,Thailand; HPV & EBV and Carcinogenesis Research Group, Khon Kaen University,Khon Kaen,Thailand.
Chamsai PientongDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University,Khon Kaen,Thailand; HPV & EBV and Carcinogenesis Research Group, Khon Kaen University,Khon Kaen,Thailand.
Supannee PromthetDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Nuntiput PutthanachoteDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Krittika SuwanrungruangCancer Unit, Srinagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Surapon WiangnonDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Khon Kaen University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background. Assessment of DNA methylation of specific genes is one approach to the diagnosis of cancer worldwide. Early stage detection is necessary to reduce the mortality rate of cancers, including those occurring in the stomach. For this purpose, tumor cells in circulating blood offer promising candidates for non-invasive diagnosis. Transcriptional inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, like PCDH10 and RASSF1A, by methylation is associated with progression of gastric cancer, and such methylation can therefore be utilized as a biomarker. Methods. The present research was conducted to evaluate DNA methylation in these two genes using blood samples of gastric cancer cases. Clinicopathological data were also analyzed and cumulative survival rates generated for comparison. Results. High frequencies of PCDH10 and RASSF1A methylations in the gastric cancer group were noted (94.1% and 83.2%, respectively, as compared to 2.97% and 5.45% in 202 matched controls). Most patients (53.4%) were in severe stage of the disease, with a median survival time of 8.4 months after diagnosis. Likewise, the patients with metastases, or RASSF1A and PCDH10 methylations, had median survival times of 7.3, 7.8, and 8.4 months, respectively. A Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that cumulative survival was significantly lower in those cases positive for methylation of RASSF1A than in their negative counterparts. Similarly, whereas almost 100% of patients positive for PCDH10 methylation had died after five years, none of the negative cases died over this period. Notably, the methylations of RASSF1A and PCDH10 were found to be higher in the late-stage patients and were also significantly correlated with metastasis and histology. Conclusions. PCDH10 and RASSF1A methylations in blood samples can serve as potential non-invasive diagnostic indicators in blood for gastric cancer. In addition to RASSF1A methylation, tumor stage proved to be a major prognostic factor in terms of survival rates.

Indexed as

Clinicopathological factorsGastric cancerPCDH10RASSF1A methylationSurvival

Identifiers

PMID27330867
PMCPMC4906662
OpenAlexW2414296372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.