Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27330738›Full record

ArticleIsrael journal of health policy research2016

Views of health system policymakers on the role of research in health policymaking in Israel.

Moriah E Ellen, Einav Horowitz, Sharona Vaknin, John N Lavis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Israel journal of health policy research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The IJHPR's growing scientific impact.Israel journal of health policy research · 2018
    Article
  7. Research in government and academia: the case of health policy.Israel journal of health policy research · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Moriah E EllenJerusalem College of Technology, Ha-Va'ad ha-Le'umi St 21, Jerusalem, 93721 Israel ; Israeli Center for Technology Assessment in Health Care, Gertner Institute, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, 52621 Israel ; McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L6 Canada ; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 4th Floor, 155 College St, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6 Canada.
Einav HorowitzIsraeli Center for Technology Assessment in Health Care, Gertner Institute, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, 52621 Israel.
Sharona VakninIsraeli Center for Technology Assessment in Health Care, Gertner Institute, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, 52621 Israel.
John N LavisMcMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L6 Canada ; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, CRL 209, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1 Canada ; Department of Political Science, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, CRL 209, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1 Canada ; Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, CRL 209, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1 Canada ; Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115-6018 USA.
Sheba Medical Center · ILBoston University · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of research evidence in health policymaking is an international challenge. Health systems, including that of Israel, are usually characterized by scarce resources and the necessity to make rapid policy decisions. Knowledge transfer and exchange (KTE) has emerged as a paradigm to start bridging the "know-do" gap. The purpose of this study was to explore the views of health system policymakers and senior executives involved in the policy development process in Israel regarding the role of health systems and policy research (HSPR) in health policymaking, the barriers and facilitators to the use of evidence in the policymaking process, and suggestions for improving the use of HSPR in the policymaking process.

methodsA survey and an interview were verbally administered in a single face-to-face meeting with health system policymakers and senior executives involved in the policy development process in Israel. The data collection period was from July to October 2014. The potential participants included members of Knesset, officials from Israel's Ministry of Health, Ministry of Finance, health services organizations, and other stakeholder organizations (i.e., National Insurance Institute). The close-ended questions were based on previous surveys that had been conducted in this field. Interviews were tape recorded and transcribed. Descriptive statistics were conducted for close ended survey-questions and thematic analysis was conducted for open-ended interview questions.

resultsThere were 32 participants in this study. Participants felt that the use of HSPR helps raise awareness on policy issues, yet the actual use of HSPR was hindered for many reasons. Facilitators do exist to support the use of HSPR in the policymaking process, such as a strong foundation of relationships between researchers and policymakers. However, many barriers exist such as the lack of relevance and timeliness of much of the currently available research to support decision-making and the paucity of funding to support research use. Suggestions to improve the use of HSPR focused on improving dissemination of research findings and ensuring that the research was more relevant and timely.

conclusionsThis research demonstrated that health systems policymakers in Israel perceive having strong relationships and collaborations with researchers however there is room for improvement, e.g. partnering in research projects to ensure relevance and use. Furthermore, health system policymakers seem to be interested in receiving relevant research in a more useable format and are open to using research in decision making.

Indexed as

Evidence informed policymakingKnowledge transfer and exchangePolicymaker

Identifiers

PMID27330738
PMCPMC4915086
OpenAlexW2471643923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.