Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27330670›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2016

Impact of Doximity Residency Rankings on Emergency Medicine Applicant Rank Lists.

William J Peterson, Laura R Hopson, Sorabh Khandelwal, Melissa White, Fiona E Gallahue, John Burkhardt, Aimee M Rolston, Sally A Santen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Program Misrepresentation in the Doximity Residency Navigator.Journal of graduate medical education · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Accuracy in Residency Program Rankings on Social Media.Journal of graduate medical education · 2019
    Article
  11. Impact of Doximity Residency Navigator on Graduate Medical Education Recruitment.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. In Regard to Huang et al.Advances in radiation oncology
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

William J PetersonUniversity of Michigan, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Laura R HopsonUniversity of Michigan, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Sorabh KhandelwalThe Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.
Melissa WhiteEmory University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Fiona E GallahueUniversity of Washington, Department of Emergency Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
John BurkhardtUniversity of Michigan, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Aimee M RolstonUniversity of Michigan, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Sally A SantenUniversity of Michigan, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USEmory University · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study investigates the impact of the Doximity rankings on the rank list choices made by residency applicants in emergency medicine (EM).

methodsWe sent an 11-item survey by email to all students who applied to EM residency programs at four different institutions representing diverse geographical regions. Students were asked questions about their perception of Doximity rankings and how it may have impacted their rank list decisions.

resultsResponse rate was 58% of 1,372 opened electronic surveys. This study found that a majority of medical students applying to residency in EM were aware of the Doximity rankings prior to submitting rank lists (67%). One-quarter of these applicants changed the number of programs and ranks of those programs when completing their rank list based on the Doximity rankings (26%). Though the absolute number of programs changed on the rank lists was small, the results demonstrate that the EM Doximity rankings impact applicant decision-making in ranking residency programs.

conclusionWhile applicants do not find the Doximity rankings to be important compared to other factors in the application process, the Doximity rankings result in a small change in residency applicant ranking behavior. This unvalidated ranking, based principally on reputational data rather than objective outcome criteria, thus has the potential to be detrimental to students, programs, and the public. We feel it important for specialties to develop consensus around measurable training outcomes and provide freely accessible metrics for candidate education.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceJob ApplicationStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesElectronic MailEmergency MedicineFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyMalePersonnel SelectionUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27330670
PMCPMC4899069
OpenAlexW2347194120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.