Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27330572›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2016

Genome-wide placental DNA methylation analysis of severely growth-discordant monochorionic twins reveals novel epigenetic targets for intrauterine growth restriction.

Maian Roifman, Sanaa Choufani, Andrei L Turinsky, Sascha Drewlo, Sarah Keating, Michael Brudno, John Kingdom, Rosanna Weksberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ATranslational pediatrics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Maternal NOProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Highlights from the International Twins Congress 2021.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maian RoifmanDivision of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Genetics and Genome Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; The Prenatal and Medical Genetics Program, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario Canada.
Sanaa ChoufaniGenetics and Genome Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario Canada.
Andrei L TurinskyGenetics and Genome Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Centre for Computational Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario Canada.
Sascha DrewloC.S. Mott Center for Human Growth and Development, Wayne State School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI USA.
Sarah KeatingMaternal-Fetal Medicine Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada.
Michael BrudnoGenetics and Genome Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Centre for Computational Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada.
John KingdomDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada.
Rosanna WeksbergDivision of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Genetics and Genome Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario Canada ; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada.
Hospital for Sick Children · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAWayne State University · US

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), which refers to reduced fetal growth in the context of placental insufficiency, is etiologically heterogeneous. IUGR is associated not only with perinatal morbidity and mortality but also with adult-onset disorders, such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes, posing a major health burden. Placental epigenetic dysregulation has been proposed as one mechanism that causes IUGR; however, the spectrum of epigenetic pathophysiological mechanisms leading to IUGR remains to be elucidated. Monozygotic monochorionic twins are particularly affected by IUGR, in the setting of severe discordant growth. Because monozygotic twins have the same genotype at conception and a shared maternal environment, they provide an ideal model system for studying epigenetic dysregulation of the placenta.

resultsWe compared genome-wide placental DNA methylation patterns of severely growth-discordant twins to identify novel candidate genes for IUGR. Snap-frozen placental samples for eight severely growth-discordant monozygotic monochorionic twin pairs were obtained at delivery from each twin. A high-resolution DNA methylation array platform was used to identify methylation differences between IUGR and normal twins. Our analysis revealed differentially methylated regions in the promoters of eight genes: DECR1, ZNF300, DNAJA4, CCL28, LEPR, HSPA1A/L, GSTO1, and GNE. The largest methylation differences between the two groups were in the promoters of DECR1 and ZNF300. The significance of these group differences was independently validated by bisulfite pyrosequencing, implicating aberrations in fatty acid beta oxidation and transcriptional regulation, respectively. Further analysis of the array data identified methylation changes most prominently affecting the Wnt and cadherin pathways in the IUGR cohort.

conclusionsOur results suggest that IUGR in monozygotic twins is associated with impairments in lipid metabolism and transcriptional regulation as well as cadherin and Wnt signaling. We show that monozygotic monochorionic twins discordant for growth provide a useful model to study one type of the epigenetic placental dysregulation that drives IUGR.

Indexed as

Diseases in TwinsDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleFetal Growth RetardationGene Expression RegulationGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMalePlacentaPregnancyPromoter Regions, GeneticTwins, MonozygoticCadherin pathwayDECR1DNA methylationIntrauterine growth restrictionLEPRMonochorionic twinsMonozygotic twinsWnt pathwayZNF300

Identifiers

PMID27330572
PMCPMC4915063
OpenAlexW2472944858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.