Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27330058›Full record

SynthesisClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2016

The Role of Proliferation in Determining Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Gene Expression-Based Meta-Analysis.

Daniel G Stover, Jonathan L Coloff, William T Barry, Joan S Brugge, Eric P Winer, Laura M Selfors

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers: a metabolic perspective.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel G StoverDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jonathan L ColoffDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
William T BarryDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Joan S BruggeDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Eric P WinerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. laura_selfors@hms.harvard.edu eric_winer@dfci.harvard.edu.
Laura M SelforsDepartment of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. laura_selfors@hms.harvard.edu eric_winer@dfci.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · US

Funding

NCI NIH HHS L30 CA189226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo provide further insight into the role of proliferation and other cellular processes in chemosensitivity and resistance, we evaluated the association of a diverse set of gene expression signatures with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL

designExpression data from primary breast cancer biopsies for 1,419 patients in 17 studies prior to NAC were identified and aggregated using common normalization procedures. Clinicopathologic characteristics, including response to NAC, were collected. Scores for 125 previously published breast cancer-related gene expression signatures were calculated for each tumor.

resultsWithin each receptor-based subgroup or PAM50 subtype, breast tumors with high proliferation signature scores were significantly more likely to achieve pathologic complete response to NAC. To distinguish "proliferation-associated" from "proliferation-independent" signatures, we used correlation and linear modeling approaches. Most signatures associated with response to NAC were proliferation associated: 90.5% (38/42) in ER

conclusionsProliferation differences account for the vast majority of predictive capacity of gene expression signatures in neoadjuvant chemosensitivity for ER

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreastCell ProliferationErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenSignal TransductionTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID27330058
PMCPMC5161615
OpenAlexW2473583993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.