Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27329857›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2016

Reverse U-to-C editing exceeds C-to-U RNA editing in some ferns - a monilophyte-wide comparison of chloroplast and mitochondrial RNA editing suggests independent evolution of the two processes in both organelles.

Nils Knie, Felix Grewe, Simon Fischer, Volker Knoop

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Plant organellar RNA maturation.The Plant cell · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Complete chloroplast genome of Austral king fernMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023
    Article
  8. What can hornworts teach us?Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evolution of mitochondrial RNA editing in extant gymnosperms.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nils KnieAbteilung Molekulare Evolution, IZMB - Institut für Zelluläre und Molekulare Botanik, Universität Bonn, Kirschallee 1, D-53115, Bonn, Germany.
Felix GrewePresent address: Department of Science and Education, Field Museum of Natural History, Integrative Research Center, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL, 60605, USA.
Simon FischerPresent address: Protrans medizinisch diagnostische Produkte GmbH, Ketschau 2, D-68766, Hockenheim, Germany.
Volker KnoopAbteilung Molekulare Evolution, IZMB - Institut für Zelluläre und Molekulare Botanik, Universität Bonn, Kirschallee 1, D-53115, Bonn, Germany. volker.knoop@uni-bonn.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8485-9423
University of Bonn · DEField Museum of Natural History · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRNA editing by C-to-U conversions is nearly omnipresent in land plant chloroplasts and mitochondria, where it mainly serves to reconstitute conserved codon identities in the organelle mRNAs. Reverse U-to-C RNA editing in contrast appears to be restricted to hornworts, some lycophytes, and ferns (monilophytes). A well-resolved monilophyte phylogeny has recently emerged and now allows to trace the side-by-side evolution of both types of pyrimidine exchange editing in the two endosymbiotic organelles.

resultsOur study of RNA editing in four selected mitochondrial genes show a wide spectrum of divergent RNA editing frequencies including a dominance of U-to-C over the canonical C-to-U editing in some taxa like the order Schizaeales. We find that silent RNA editing leaving encoded amino acids unchanged is highly biased with more than ten-fold amounts of silent C-to-U over U-to-C edits. In full contrast to flowering plants, RNA editing frequencies are low in early-branching monilophyte lineages but increase in later emerging clades. Moreover, while editing rates in the two organelles are usually correlated, we observe uncoupled evolution of editing frequencies in fern mitochondria and chloroplasts. Most mitochondrial RNA editing sites are shared between the recently emerging fern orders whereas chloroplast editing sites are mostly clade-specific. Finally, we observe that chloroplast RNA editing appears to be completely absent in horsetails (Equisetales), the sister clade of all other monilophytes.

conclusionsC-to-U and U-to-C RNA editing in fern chloroplasts and mitochondria follow disinct evolutionary pathways that are surprisingly different from what has previously been found in flowering plants. The results call for careful differentiation of the two types of RNA editing in the two endosymbiotic organelles in comparative evolutionary studies.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionChloroplastsCytosineEquisetumFernsMagnoliopsidaMitochondriaMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyRNARNA, ChloroplastRNA EditingRNA, MitochondrialRNA, PlantRNA, Small NuclearUracilCytosineRNARNA, ChloroplastRNA, MitochondrialRNA, PlantRNA, Small NuclearUracilChloroplastsEditing lossEquisetumFernsMitochondriaMonilophytesPPR proteinsReverse editingRNA editing

Identifiers

PMID27329857
PMCPMC4915041
OpenAlexW2472287443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.