Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27329590›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Telomeric repeat-binding factor 2: a marker for survival and anti-EGFR efficacy in oral carcinoma.

Yordan Benhamou, Vincent Picco, Hélène Raybaud, Anne Sudaka, Emmanuel Chamorey, Sanja Brolih, Martino Monteverde, Marco Merlano, Cristiana Lo Nigro, Damien Ambrosetti and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Telomere-related Markers for Cancer.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Yordan BenhamouCNRS UMR 7284/INSERM U1081, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging of Nice, University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.
Vincent PiccoBiomedical Department, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, Principality of Monaco.
Hélène RaybaudCentral Laboratory of Pathology, University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.
Anne SudakaDepartment of Pathology, Research and Statistics, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Emmanuel ChamoreyDepartment of Pathology, Research and Statistics, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
Sanja BrolihBiomedical Department, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, Principality of Monaco.
Martino MonteverdeCancer Genetics and Translational Oncology Laboratory, S. Croce & Carle Teaching Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
Marco MerlanoMedical Oncology, Oncology Department, S. Croce & Carle Teaching Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
Cristiana Lo NigroCancer Genetics and Translational Oncology Laboratory, S. Croce & Carle Teaching Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
Damien AmbrosettiCentral Laboratory of Pathology, University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.
Gilles PagèsCNRS UMR 7284/INSERM U1081, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging of Nice, University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.
Centre Antoine Lacassagne · FRScientific Centre of Monaco · MCUniversité Côte d'Azur · FRAzienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera S.Croce e Carle Cuneo · ITCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common oral cancer worldwide. Treatments including surgery, radio- and chemo-therapies mostly result in debilitating side effects. Thus, a more accurate evaluation of patients at risk of recurrence after radio/chemo treatment is important for preserving their quality of life. We assessed whether the Telomeric Repeat-binding Factor 2 (TERF2) influences tumor aggressiveness and treatment response. TERF2 is over-expressed in many cancers but its correlation to patient outcome remains controversial in OSCC. Our retrospective study on sixty-two patients showed that TERF2 overexpression has a negative impact on survival time. TERF2-dependent survival time was independent of tumor size in a multivariate analysis. In vitro, TERF2 knockdown by RNA interference had no effect on cell proliferation, migration, senescence and apoptosis. Instead, TERF2 knockdown increased the expression of cytokines implicated in inflammation and angiogenesis, except for vascular endothelial growth factor. TERF2 knockdown resulted in a decrease vascularization and growth of xenograft tumors. Finally, response to erlotinib/Tarceva and cetuximab/Erbitux treatment was increased in TRF2 knocked-down cells. Hence, TERF2 may represent an independent marker of survival for OSCC and a predictive marker for cetuximab/Erbitux and erlotinib/Tarceva efficacy.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Line, TumorCetuximabDown-RegulationErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleGene Knockdown TechniquesHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiceMice, NudeMouth NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCetuximabEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideProtein Kinase InhibitorsTelomeric Repeat Binding Protein 2TERF2 protein, humanoral cancerpredictive factorprognostic factortargeted therapiestumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID27329590
PMCPMC5190092
OpenAlexW2425438880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.