Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27329253›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2016

Paradoxical reaction in tuberculous meningitis: presentation, predictors and impact on prognosis.

Anurag Kumar Singh, Hardeep Singh Malhotra, Ravindra Kumar Garg, Amita Jain, Neeraj Kumar, Neera Kohli, Rajesh Verma, Praveen Kumar Sharma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A teenage girl with altered mental status and paraparesis.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anurag Kumar SinghDepartment of Neurology, King George Medical University, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, PIN-226003, India.
Hardeep Singh MalhotraDepartment of Neurology, King George Medical University, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, PIN-226003, India.
Ravindra Kumar GargDepartment of Neurology, King George Medical University, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, PIN-226003, India. garg50@yahoo.com.
Amita JainDepartment of Microbiology, King George Medical University, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, India.
Neeraj KumarDepartment of Neurology, King George Medical University, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, PIN-226003, India.
Neera KohliDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, King George Medical University, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, India.
Rajesh VermaDepartment of Neurology, King George Medical University, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, PIN-226003, India.
Praveen Kumar SharmaDepartment of Neurology, King George Medical University, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, PIN-226003, India.
King George's Medical University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAwareness about paradoxical reactions in tuberculous meningitis is crucial as a paradoxical reaction may lead to certain wrong conclusions (for example, an erroneous diagnosis, and a possibility of treatment failure, mycobacterial drug-resistance, drug toxicity, or presence of a malignancy). The present study was planned to evaluate the incidence and predictive factors of paradoxical reactions in light of clinical, cerebrospinal fluid, and neuroimaging characteristics.

methodsIn this prospective cohort study, consecutive patients fulfilling the International Consensus criteria of tuberculous meningitis were included. Patients were subjected to clinical evaluation, cerebrospinal fluid evaluation, and neuroimaging. Patients were treated with anti-tuberculosis drugs along with corticosteroids. Patients were regularly followed up at 3 monthly intervals. At each follow up patients were evaluated clinically and repeat cerebrospinal fluid analysis was performed along with repeat neuroimaging. Disability assessment was done using Barthel index.

resultsWe enrolled 141 patients of tuberculous meningitis. Approximately one-third of patients (44/141; 31.2 %) developed a paradoxical reaction. Twenty-seven patients developed hydrocephalus, 26 developed tuberculomas, 12 developed optochiasmatic arachnoiditis and 4 patients had spinal arachnoiditis. In 41 patients (out of 44) cerebrospinal fluid paradoxically worsened (increase in cells and/or protein); 2 demonstrated a decrease in cells with polymorph predominance while in one it was normal. In 3 patients, paradoxical cerebrospinal fluid changes were not associated with neuroimaging changes. On multivariate analysis, predictors of paradoxical reaction were female gender (p = 0.013), HIV positivity (p = 0.01) and a shorter duration of illness (p = 0.049). Development of paradoxical reactions did not predict the disability status of the patients.

conclusionsParadoxical reaction occurs in approximately one-third of patients with tuberculous meningitis. Female gender, concomitant HIV infection, and a shorter duration of illness were significant predictors. Paradoxical reactions did not adversely affect the outcome.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntitubercular AgentsArachnoiditisCohort StudiesComorbidityDisease ProgressionFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansHydrocephalusIncidenceIndiaMaleMultivariate AnalysisPrognosisAntitubercular AgentsCerebrospinal fluidHydrocephalusImmune reconstitution inflammatory syndromeOptochiasmatic arachnoiditisTuberculoma

Identifiers

PMID27329253
PMCPMC4915108
OpenAlexW2460757682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.