Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27329032›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2016

β-Lactams and β-Lactamase Inhibitors: An Overview.

Karen Bush, Patricia A Bradford

Open access · bronzeAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 651 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
651citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

651 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1,216 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Virulence · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. UropathogenicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

591 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen BushMolecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405.
Patricia A BradfordAstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451.
AstraZeneca (South Korea) · KRIndiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

β-Lactams are the most widely used class of antibiotics. Since the discovery of benzylpenicillin in the 1920s, thousands of new penicillin derivatives and related β-lactam classes of cephalosporins, cephamycins, monobactams, and carbapenems have been discovered. Each new class of β-lactam has been developed either to increase the spectrum of activity to include additional bacterial species or to address specific resistance mechanisms that have arisen in the targeted bacterial population. Resistance to β-lactams is primarily because of bacterially produced β-lactamase enzymes that hydrolyze the β-lactam ring, thereby inactivating the drug. The newest effort to circumvent resistance is the development of novel broad-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitors that work against many problematic β-lactamases, including cephalosporinases and serine-based carbapenemases, which severely limit therapeutic options. This work provides a comprehensive overview of β-lactam antibiotics that are currently in use, as well as a look ahead to several new compounds that are in the development pipeline.

Indexed as

beta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-Lactam ResistanceCarbapenemsCephalosporinsHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansMonobactamsPenicillinsbeta-Lactamase InhibitorsCarbapenemsCephalosporinsMonobactamsPenicillins

Identifiers

PMID27329032
PMCPMC4968164
OpenAlexW2463871935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.