Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27328916›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pediatric psychology2017

Barriers to Recruitment in Pediatric Obesity Trials: Comparing Opt-in and Opt-out Recruitment Approaches.

Mary Beth McCullough, David Janicke, Cathleen Odar Stough, Shannon Robson, Christopher Bolling, Cindy Zion, Lori Stark

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Facilitators and barriers of children's participation in nutrition, physical activity, and obesity interventions: A systematic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mary Beth McCulloughDivision of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
David JanickeDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Cathleen Odar StoughDivision of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Shannon RobsonDepartment of Behavioral Health and Nutrition, University of Delaware, 26 N College Avenue, Newark, DE, USA.
Christopher BollingPediatric Associates, PSC, Crestview Hills, Kentucky, KY, USA.
Cindy ZionDivision of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Lori StarkDivision of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USUniversity of Delaware · USUniversity of Florida Health · US

Funding

Research Training in Child Behavior and NutritionT32DK063929 · NIDDK · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI SCOTT W POWERS, MARGARET H ZELLER · 2003 to 2026
$6.0M
Clinic and Home Family Based Behavioral Treatment for Obese Preschoolers: LAUNCHR01DK091251 · NIDDK · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI STARK, LORI J · 2011 to 2015
$3.1M
Extension Family Lifestyle Intervention Project (FLIP for Kids)R18DK082374 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI JANICKE, DAVID M · 2009 to 2013
$2.4M
Community-Based Healthy-lifestyle Intervention for Rural Preschoolers(CHIRP StudyR21DK095269 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI JANICKE, DAVID M · 2012 to 2013
$403k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK091251NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK082374NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK095269NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK063929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of opt-in versus opt-out recruitment methods in pediatric weight management clinical trials. Methods: Recruitment of preschoolers and school-age children across two obesity randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were compared using the same opt-in recruitment approach (parents contact researchers in response to mailings). Opt-in and opt-out strategies (parents send decline postcard in response to mailings if they do not want to participate) were then compared across two preschool obesity RCTs. Results: Opt-in strategies yielded a significantly lower overall recruitment rate among preschoolers compared with school-age children. Among preschoolers, an opt-out strategy demonstrated a significantly higher overall recruitment rate compared with an opt-in strategy with the main advantage in the number of families initially contacted. Conclusions: Opt-out recruitment strategies may be more effective in overcoming the barriers of recruitment in the preschool age-group because it does not rely on parent recognition of obesity.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionBody WeightChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleParentsPediatric Obesitychildrenobesityweight management

Identifiers

PMID27328916
PMCPMC6497420
OpenAlexW2467207551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.