ArticleAnnals of botany2016
Global Genome Biodiversity Network: saving a blueprint of the Tree of Life - a botanical perspective.
Article in Annals of botany, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extending Specimens to Save Plant DNA: Structuring Department DNA Collections in Times of Biodiversity Loss.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Molecular Passports for Ex Situ Seed Donors: Enhanced Genetic Monitoring for Plant Conservation.Molecular ecology · 2026Review
- High-performance living plant collections require a globally integrated data ecosystem to meet twenty-first-century challenges.Nature plants · 2026Review
- Green plant genomes: What we know in an era of rapidly expanding opportunities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Fungal biodiversity and conservation mycology in light of new technology, big data, and changing attitudes.Current biology : CB · 2021Review
- A Critical Review of the Current Global Ex Situ Conservation System for Plant Agrobiodiversity. II. Strengths and Weaknesses of the Current System and Recommendations for Its Improvement.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The critical role of natural history museums in advancing eDNA for biodiversity studies: a case study with Amazonian fishes.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- A Critical Review of the Current Global Ex Situ Conservation System for Plant Agrobiodiversity. I. History of the Development of the Global System in the Context of the Political/Legal Framework and Its Major Conservation Components.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Article
- Microfluidic Enrichment Barcoding (MEBarcoding): a new method for high throughput plant DNA barcoding.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Whole-genome sequencing and analysis of the Chinese herbal plantActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2020Article
- Earth BioGenome Project: Sequencing life for the future of life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Guidelines for collecting vouchers and tissues intended for genomic work (Smithsonian Institution): Botany Best Practices.Biodiversity data journal · 2017Article
- Article
- Article
- A workflow to preserve genome-quality tissue samples from plants in botanical gardens and arboreta.Applications in plant sciences · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenomic research depends upon access to DNA or tissue collected and preserved according to high-quality standards. At present, the collections in most natural history museums do not sufficiently address these standards, making them often hard or impossible to use for whole-genome sequencing or transcriptomics. In response to these challenges, natural history museums, herbaria, botanical gardens and other stakeholders have started to build high-quality biodiversity biobanks. Unfortunately, information about these collections remains fragmented, scattered and largely inaccessible. Without a central registry or even an overview of relevant institutions, it is difficult and time-consuming to locate the needed samples. SCOPE: The Global Genome Biodiversity Network (GGBN) was created to fill this vacuum by establishing a one-stop access point for locating samples meeting quality standards for genome-scale applications, while complying with national and international legislations and conventions. Increased accessibility to genomic samples will further genomic research and development, conserve genetic resources, help train the next generation of genome researchers and raise the visibility of biodiversity collections. Additionally, the availability of a data-sharing platform will facilitate identification of gaps in the collections, thereby empowering targeted sampling efforts, increasing the breadth and depth of preservation of genetic diversity. The GGBN is rapidly growing and currently has 41 members. The GGBN covers all branches of the Tree of Life, except humans, but here the focus is on a pilot project with emphasis on 'harvesting' the Tree of Life for vascular plant taxa to enable genome-level studies.
conclusionWhile current efforts are centred on getting the existing samples of all GGBN members online, a pilot project, GGI-Gardens, has been launched as proof of concept. Over the next 6 years GGI-Gardens aims to add to the GGBN high-quality genetic material from at least one species from each of the approx. 460 vascular plant families and one species from half of the approx. 15 000 vascular plant genera.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.