ArticleHeredity2016
Metapopulation effective size and conservation genetic goals for the Fennoscandian wolf (Canis lupus) population.
Article in Heredity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effective size of the Scandinavian wolf population is too small for both short- and long-term conservation.Heredity · 2026Article
- Genomic Analysis Reveals Inbreeding in an Island Population of Alexander Archipelago Wolves.Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
- Wolf Population Size and Composition in One of Europe's Strongholds, the Romanian Carpathians.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Estimating the Effective Size of European Wolf Populations.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- Unraveling the Complexity of theEvolutionary applications · 2024Review
- Assessment of the Global Variance Effective Size of Subdivided Populations, and Its Relation to Other Effective Sizes.Acta biotheoretica · 2023Article
- Monitoring genetic diversity with new indicators applied to an alpine freshwater top predator.Molecular ecology · 2022Article
- Appeasing Pheromones for the Management of Stress and Aggression during Conservation of Wild Canids: Could the Solution Be Right under Our Nose?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
- Characterizing patterns of genomic variation in the threatened Utah prairie dog: Implications for conservation and management.Evolutionary applications · 2021Article
- Wolf Delisting Challenges Demonstrate Need for an Improved Framework for Conserving Intraspecific Variation under the Endangered Species Act.Bioscience · 2021Article
- Biological and Sociopolitical Sources of Uncertainty in Population Viability Analysis for Endangered Species Recovery Planning.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Genomic analyses suggest adaptive differentiation of northern European native cattle breeds.Evolutionary applications · 2019Article
- Do estimates of contemporary effective population size tell us what we want to know?Molecular ecology · 2019Article
- Genetic substructure and admixture as important factors in linkage disequilibrium-based estimation of effective number of breeders in recovering wildlife populations.Ecology and evolution · 2017Article
- gesp: A computer program for modelling genetic effective population size, inbreeding and divergence in substructured populations.Molecular ecology resources · 2017Article
- Effective population size in ecology and evolution.Heredity · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Scandinavian wolf population descends from only five individuals, is isolated, highly inbred and exhibits inbreeding depression. To meet international conservation goals, suggestions include managing subdivided wolf populations over Fennoscandia as a metapopulation; a genetically effective population size of Ne⩾500, in line with the widely accepted long-term genetic viability target, might be attainable with gene flow among subpopulations of Scandinavia, Finland and Russian parts of Fennoscandia. Analytical means for modeling Ne of subdivided populations under such non-idealized situations have been missing, but we recently developed new mathematical methods for exploring inbreeding dynamics and effective population size of complex metapopulations. We apply this theory to the Fennoscandian wolves using empirical estimates of demographic parameters. We suggest that the long-term conservation genetic target for metapopulations should imply that inbreeding rates in the total system and in the separate subpopulations should not exceed Δf=0.001. This implies a meta-Ne of NeMeta⩾500 and a realized effective size of each subpopulation of NeRx⩾500. With current local effective population sizes and one migrant per generation, as recommended by management guidelines, the meta-Ne that can be reached is ~250. Unidirectional gene flow from Finland to Scandinavia reduces meta-Ne to ~130. Our results indicate that both local subpopulation effective sizes and migration among subpopulations must increase substantially from current levels to meet the conservation target. Alternatively, immigration from a large (Ne⩾500) population in northwestern Russia could support the Fennoscandian metapopulation, but immigration must be substantial (5-10 effective immigrants per generation) and migration among Fennoscandian subpopulations must nevertheless increase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.