Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27327960›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Genome-Wide Characterization of Major Intrinsic Proteins in Four Grass Plants and Their Non-Aqua Transport Selectivity Profiles with Comparative Perspective.

Abul Kalam Azad, Jahed Ahmed, Md Asraful Alum, Md Mahbub Hasan, Takahiro Ishikawa, Yoshihiro Sawa, Maki Katsuhara

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pearl Millet Aquaporin GeneFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  5. Expression of a COeLife · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. How Plants Handle Trivalent (+3) Elements.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Abul Kalam AzadDepartment of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet 3114, Bangladesh.
Jahed AhmedDepartment of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet 3114, Bangladesh.
Md Asraful AlumForensic DNA Laboratory of Bangladesh Police, Malibagh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Mahbub HasanDepartment of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Chittagong, Chittagong 4331, Bangladesh.
Takahiro IshikawaDepartment of Life Science and Biotechnology, Shimane University, Shimane 690-8504, Japan.
Yoshihiro SawaDepartment of Life Science and Biotechnology, Shimane University, Shimane 690-8504, Japan.
Maki KatsuharaInstitute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University, Chuo-2-chome, Kurashiki 710-0046, Japan.
Shahjalal University of Science and Technology · BDShimane University · JPOkayama University · JPUniversity of Chittagong · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major intrinsic proteins (MIPs), commonly known as aquaporins, transport not only water in plants but also other substrates of physiological significance and heavy metals. In most of the higher plants, MIPs are divided into five subfamilies (PIPs, TIPs, NIPs, SIPs and XIPs). Herein, we identified 68, 42, 38 and 28 full-length MIPs, respectively in the genomes of four monocot grass plants, specifically Panicum virgatum, Setaria italica, Sorghum bicolor and Brachypodium distachyon. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the grass plants had only four MIP subfamilies including PIPs, TIPs, NIPs and SIPs without XIPs. Based on structural analysis of the homology models and comparing the primary selectivity-related motifs [two NPA regions, aromatic/arginine (ar/R) selectivity filter and Froger's positions (FPs)] of all plant MIPs that have been experimentally proven to transport non-aqua substrates, we predicted the transport profiles of all MIPs in the four grass plants and also in eight other plants. Groups of MIP subfamilies based on ar/R selectivity filter and FPs were linked to the non-aqua transport profiles. We further deciphered the substrate selectivity profiles of the MIPs in the four grass plants and compared them with their counterparts in rice, maize, soybean, poplar, cotton, Arabidopsis thaliana, Physcomitrella patens and Selaginella moellendorffii. In addition to two NPA regions, ar/R filter and FPs, certain residues, especially in loops B and C, contribute to the functional distinctiveness of MIP groups. Expression analysis of transcripts in different organs indicated that non-aqua transport was related to expression of MIPs since most of the unexpressed MIPs were not predicted to facilitate the transport of non-aqua molecules. Among all MIPs in every plant, TIP (BdTIP1;1, SiTIP1;2, SbTIP2;1 and PvTIP1;2) had the overall highest mean expression. Our study generates significant information for understanding the diversity, evolution, non-aqua transport profiles and insight into comparative transport selectivity of plant MIPs, and provides tools for the development of transgenic plants.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantAmino Acid MotifsAquaporinsEvolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsPlant RootsPlant ShootsPoaceaeProtein TransportSubcellular FractionsSubstrate SpecificityTerminology as TopicWaterAquaporinsmajor intrinsic protein, plantPlant ProteinsWater

Identifiers

PMID27327960
PMCPMC4915720
OpenAlexW2470558202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.