ArticleJournal of hypertension2016
Multivitamin use and the risk of hypertension in a prospective cohort study of women.
Article in Journal of hypertension, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multivitamin/mineral supplementation and the risk of cardiovascular disease: a large prospective study using UK Biobank data.European journal of nutrition · 2022Article
- Dietary Supplements-For Whom? The Current State of Knowledge about the Health Effects of Selected Supplement Use.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Effects of vitamin supplements on clinical cardiovascular outcomes: Time to move on! - A comprehensive review.Clinical nutrition ESPEN · 2021Review
- Lifestyle interventions for the prevention and treatment of hypertension.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2021Review
- Associations of Blood Pressure with the Factors among Adults in Jilin Province: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Quantile Regression Analysis.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDespite the widespread use of multivitamin supplements, little is known regarding their effects on blood pressure (BP) and the development of hypertension. We, therefore, sought to prospectively investigate how multivitamin use was associated with incident hypertension among middle-aged and older women.
methodsWe studied 28 157 women from the Women's Health Study aged at least 45 years and free of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and hypertension at baseline. Women reported information on a wide range of lifestyle, clinical, and dietary factors, including multivitamin and other supplement use at baseline. Hypertension was identified on baseline and annual follow-up questionnaires. Incident hypertension was defined as either a new diagnosis of hypertension by a physician, initiation of antihypertensive medication, newly reported SBP at least 140 mmHg, or DBP at least 90 mmHg during follow-up.
resultsDuring a mean follow-up of 11.5 years, we identified 16 316 cases of incident hypertension. We found that neither baseline (hazard ratio = 1.03, 95% confidence interval: 1.00, 1.07) nor time-varying multivitamin use (hazard ratio = 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.94-1.00) were associated with the risk of incident hypertension in multivariable-adjusted models. When we investigated the duration of multivitamin use reported at baseline, we also observed no association with the risk of hypertension.
conclusionThe results from this prospective study of middle-aged and older women suggest that neither baseline multivitamin use nor time-varying multivitamin use is associated with the risk of developing hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.