Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27326542›Full record

ArticleScientific data2016

The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments.

Krzysztof J Gorgolewski, Tibor Auer, Vince D Calhoun, R Cameron Craddock, Samir Das, Eugene P Duff, Guillaume Flandin, Satrajit S Ghosh, Tristan Glatard, Yaroslav O Halchenko and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,034 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,034citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,034 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neural signatures of serial order access in verbal working memory.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Building an open infrastructure for molecular neuroimaging: Standards and tools from the OpenNeuroPET initiative.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Review
  14. Increased Attentive Use Is Linked to More Idiosyncratic Functional Connections.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

974 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Krzysztof J GorgolewskiDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Tibor AuerMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK.
Vince D CalhounThe Mind Research Network, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA.
R Cameron CraddockComputational Neuroimaging Lab, Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York 10962, USA.
Samir DasMcGill Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Ludmer Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2B4.
Eugene P DuffFMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Guillaume FlandinWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Satrajit S GhoshMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5312-6729
Tristan GlatardMcGill Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Ludmer Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2B4.
Yaroslav O HalchenkoDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA.
Daniel A HandwerkerIntramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, USA.
Michael HankeDepartment of Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg 39016, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6398-6370
David KeatorDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California, California, Irvine 92697, USA.
Xiangrui LiCenter for Cognitive and Behavioral Brain Imaging, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
Zachary MichaelSquishymedia, Portland, Oregon 97232, USA.
Camille MaumetWMG, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
B Nolan NicholsCenter for Health Sciences, SRI International, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA.
Thomas E NicholsWMG, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
John PellmanCenter for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, New York, New York 10022, USA.
Jean-Baptiste PolineHenry Wheeler Jr. Brain Imaging Center, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9794-749X
Ariel RokemThe University of Washington eScience Institute, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
Gunnar SchaeferDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Vanessa SochatProgram in Biomedical Informatics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4387-3819
William TriplettDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Jessica A TurnerThe Mind Research Network, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA.
Gaël VaroquauxParietal team, INRIA Saclay, Palaiseau 91120, FR.
Russell A PoldrackDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.

Funding

Resource DiscoveryP41EB019936 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI David Nelson Kennedy · 2016 to 2026
$15.2M
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Auditory Verbal HalluciP20GM103472 · NIGMS · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI ABBOTT, CHRISTOPHER C · 2012 to 2017
$14.3M
Multivariate methods for identifying multitask/multimodal brain imaging biomarkersR01EB006841 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI VINCE D CALHOUN, Sergey Plis · 2007 to 2026
$9.8M
N-CANDA: DATA ANALYSIS COMPONENTU01AA021697 · NIAAA · SRI INTERNATIONAL · PI PFEFFERBAUM, ADOLF, POHL, KILIAN MARIA · 2012 to 2015
$3.6M
Unified multivariate data-driven solutions for static and dynamic brain connectivityR01EB020407 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2015 to 2018
$2.7M
Intramural NIH HHSMedical Research CouncilNIAAA NIH HHS 1 U01 AA021697NIAAA NIH HHS 1 U01 AA021697-04S1NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA021697NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB019936NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006841NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020407NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103472NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM103472Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques has defined modern neuroimaging. Since its inception, tens of thousands of studies using techniques such as functional MRI and diffusion weighted imaging have allowed for the non-invasive study of the brain. Despite the fact that MRI is routinely used to obtain data for neuroscience research, there has been no widely adopted standard for organizing and describing the data collected in an imaging experiment. This renders sharing and reusing data (within or between labs) difficult if not impossible and unnecessarily complicates the application of automatic pipelines and quality assurance protocols. To solve this problem, we have developed the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS), a standard for organizing and describing MRI datasets. The BIDS standard uses file formats compatible with existing software, unifies the majority of practices already common in the field, and captures the metadata necessary for most common data processing operations.

Indexed as

Datasets as TopicMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingData CollectionHumans

Identifiers

PMID27326542
PMCPMC4978148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.