Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27326406›Full record

ReviewInvestigative and clinical urology2016

Active surveillance for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.

Makito Miyake, Kiyohide Fujimoto, Yoshihiko Hirao

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Investigative and clinical urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Advances in the management of localized bladder cancers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Makito MiyakeDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Kiyohide FujimotoDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
Yoshihiko HiraoDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.; Department of Urology, Osaka Gyoumeikan Hospital, Konohana-ku, Osaka, Japan.
Nara Medical University · JPOsaka Ekisaikai Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is known to be a heterogeneous malignancy that requires varying treatment modalities and follow-up schedules. Low-grade Ta papillary tumors are categorized as low-risk NMIBC because of their favorable prognosis. There is an expanding movement that overdiagnosis and overtreatment should be avoided considering the economic impact and the patients' quality of life. It has been over 10 years since the initial assessment of active surveillance for low-risk NMIBC suggested its feasibility and safety. However, urologists are still unfamiliar with this treatment option, which can be ideal in appropriately selected patients. In this review article, we focus on active surveillance for low-risk NMIBC and discuss the evidence and rationale for this treatment option. There are several issues to resolve in order to advocate active surveillance as a standard option in selected patients. A specific follow-up protocol including intervals of cystoscopy, urine cytology, urine markers, and other radiographic examinations need to be optimized and validated. Finally, we integrate the available data into the follow-up strategy and propose a new surveillance protocol for active surveillance of recurrent low-risk bladder cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalEvidence-Based MedicineHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPopulation SurveillancePrognosisUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsWatchful WaitingLocal neoplasm recurrenceRisk assessmentUrinary bladder neoplasmsWatchful waiting

Identifiers

PMID27326406
PMCPMC4910757
OpenAlexW2419482118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.