ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2016
[S2k guidelines on diagnostics, therapy and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis (AWMF 043/025) : Compendium].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical management of urolithiasis - a systematic analysis of available guidelines.BMC urology · 2018Pooled it
- Postoperative urinary stone analysis-influence of the hydrogel retrieval method on stone analysis.World journal of urology · 2025Trial
- Separate core-shell analysis of urinary stones may influence specific metaphylaxis.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Risk factors of bladder stones in neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: A real-world study.BJUI compass · 2024Article
- Protocol analysis of dual-energy CT for optimization of kidney stone detection in virtual non-contrast reconstructions.European radiology · 2020Article
- [Differential diagnosis of acute back pain and demarcation to other specialist fields].Der Orthopade · 2019Review
- Hospital volume in ureterorenoscopic stone treatment: 99 operations per year could increase the chance of a better outcome-results of the German prospective multicentre BUSTER project.World journal of urology · 2019Observational
- The status of medical expulsive therapy in the age of evidence-based medicine.Annals of translational medicine · 2018Article
- ["We're going to place a ureteral stent …" : Development and use of the terms stent and splint by German-speaking urologists].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2018Article
- [Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2018Article
- [Interrater reliability and clinical impact of the Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS) grading system for ureteral lesions after ureteroscopy : Results of the German prospective multicenter BUSTER project].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2018Article
- [Forced diuresis for acute ureteric colic].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2017Review
- [What is the current status of shock wave lithotripsy?]Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2017Review
- [Ureterorenoscopy].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2017Review
- [Urolithiasis guidelines: retrospective view and perspectives].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2016Review
- [Individualized evidence-based interventional stone treatment : One stone, many question marks?]Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2016Article
- [The most important current guideline recommendations on the topic urolithiasis : A brief comparison].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2016Article
- [Urolithiasis 2016 : Reliable, effective and low radiation exposure].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2016Review
- [Operative technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2016Review
- [Diagnostic imaging of urolithiais. Current recommendations and new developments].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Every tenth German citizen will suffer from at least one urinary calculus during the lifetime. The diagnostics, treatment and follow-up treatment of urolithiasis are, therefore, part of the daily routine practice for all urologists in hospitals and private practices as well as in many other disciplines, such as general practitioners, internists, nephrologists and pediatricians. Although the diagnostics and therapy have experienced substantial alterations over the last 10 years, the possibilities of metabolic diagnostics and secondary prevention for patients at risk are, unfortunately and unjustly, in many places very poorly represented. The present S2k guidelines, which for the first time were established in an interdisciplinary consensus process, represent the current practical recommendations and, whenever possible, use tables and algorithms in order to facilitate easy reference in the routine daily work. Last but not least, this greatly simplifies the measures for metaphylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.