Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27325389›Full record

Trial reportJournal of diabetes science and technology2016

Real-World Data Collection Regarding Titration Algorithms for Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Andreas Pfützner, Bernd Stratmann, Klaus Funke, Harald Pohlmeier, Ludger Rose, Jochen Sieber, Frank Flacke, Diethelm Tschoepe

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Insulin Initiation and Titration in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andreas PfütznerPfützner Science & Health Institute, Mainz, Germany Andreas.pfuetzner@pfuetzner-mainz.com.
Bernd StratmannHerz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Klaus FunkeIKFE-Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Harald PohlmeierDiabetes Research Center, Münster, Germany.
Ludger RoseDiabetes Research Center, Münster, Germany.
Jochen SieberSanofi, Frankfurt, Germany.
Frank FlackeSanofi, Frankfurt, Germany.
Diethelm TschoepeHerz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to collect data regarding the effectiveness of different dose titration algorithms (TAs) for optimization or initiation of basal insulin supported oral therapy (BOT) in patients with type 2 diabetes. A total of 50 patients were enrolled in this trial (17 women, 33 men, age 63 ± 8 years, HbA1c 7.9 ± 0.8%). The investigator decided on an individual basis to apply any of 4 standard TAs: standard (S: fasting glucose target 90-130 mg/dL, n = 39), standard-fast titration (S-FT: 90-130 mg/dL, larger dose increments at FBG < 180 mg/dl, n = 1), less tight (LT: 110-150 mg/dL, n = 5), and tight (T: 70-100 mg/dL, n = 5). During the next 30 days daily contacts were used to adapt the insulin dose. The majority of all patients (70%) achieved a stable insulin glargine dose within 5 ± 6 days after initiation of the dose titration. HbA1c improved from 7.9 ± 0.8% to 7.5 ± 0.7% (P < .001). In total, 1300 dose decisions were made (1192 according to the TA and 108 by the physicians independently from the TA in 29 patients [58% of study population]). Reasons for TA-overruling dosing decisions were hypoglycemic events (14 mild/4 moderate) in 9 patients. In the majority of these cases (89.8%), the physician recommended continuation of the previous dose or a higher dose. The majority of FBG values were within the respective target range after 4 weeks. In conclusion, the insulin glargine TAs delivered safe dose recommendations with a low risk of hypoglycemia, which successfully led to a stable dose in the vast majority of patients.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdultAgedBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin GlargineMaleMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin Glarginebasal insulinfasting blood glucosetitration algorithm

Identifiers

PMID27325389
PMCPMC5032964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.