Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27325247›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2017

[German version of the Northoff catatonia rating scale (NCRS-dv) : A validated instrument for measuring catatonic symptoms].

D Hirjak, P A Thomann, G Northoff, K M Kubera, R C Wolf

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Different faces of catatonia and how to approach them.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  6. Characterizing the sensorimotor domain in schizophrenia spectrum disorders.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Multiparametric mapping of white matter microstructure in catatonia.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D HirjakZentrum für psychosoziale Medizin, Klinik für Allgemeine Psychiatrie, Universität Heidelberg, Voßstraße 4, 69115, Heidelberg, Deutschland. dusan.hirjak@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
P A ThomannZentrum für psychosoziale Medizin, Klinik für Allgemeine Psychiatrie, Universität Heidelberg, Voßstraße 4, 69115, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
G NorthoffMind, Brain Imaging and Neuroethics Research Unit, The Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
K M KuberaZentrum für psychosoziale Medizin, Klinik für Allgemeine Psychiatrie, Universität Heidelberg, Voßstraße 4, 69115, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
R C WolfKlinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical picture of catatonia includes impressive motor phenomena, such as rigidity, dyskinesia, festination, negativism, posturing, catalepsy, stereotypies and mannerisms, along with affective (e. g. aggression, anxiety, anhedonism or emotional lability) and behavioral symptoms (e.g. mutism, autism, excitement, echolalia or echopraxia). In English speaking countries seven catatonia rating scales have been introduced, which are widely used in clinical and scientific practice. In contrast, only one validated catatonia rating scale is available in Germany so far. In this paper, we introduce the German version of the Northoff catatonia rating scale (NCRS-dv). The original English version of the NCRS consists of 40 items describing motor (13 items), affective (12 items) and behavioral (15 items) catatonic symptoms. The NCRS shows high internal reliability (Crombachs alpha = 0.87), high interrater (r = 0.80-0.96) and high intrarater (r = 0.80-0.95) reliability. Factor analysis of the NCRS revealed four domains: affective, hyperactive or excited, hypoactive or retarded and behavior with individual eigenvalues of 8.98, 3.61, 2.98 and 2.82, respectively, which explained 21.5 %, 9.3 %, 7.6 % and 7.2 % of variance, respectively. In conclusion, the NCRS-dv represents a second validated instrument which can be used by German clinicians and scientists for the assessment of catatonic symptoms.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonBehavior Rating ScaleGermanyHumansObserver VariationPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSchizophrenia, CatatonicCatatoniaDiagnosisGenuine motor symptomsScaleSchizophrenia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.