Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27325016›Full record

ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2016

Molecular pathological classification of colorectal cancer.

Mike F Müller, Ashraf E K Ibrahim, Mark J Arends

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05234177 (Tempus CRC Surveillance Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 228 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
228citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
23.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05234177 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Tempus CRC Surveillance Study: A Longitudinal Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Biomarker Profiling Study of Patients With Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Using Comprehensive Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)Assays

TypeobservationalSponsorTempus AIRan2022 to 2029Enrolled300ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsObservation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

228 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 429 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluating the utility ofEpigenetics · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

168 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mike F MüllerDivision of Pathology, Centre for Comparative Pathology, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, UK.
Ashraf E K IbrahimDepartment of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Mark J ArendsDivision of Pathology, Centre for Comparative Pathology, Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, UK. M.Arends@ed.ac.uk.
Western General Hospital · GBBedford Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) shows variable underlying molecular changes with two major mechanisms of genetic instability: chromosomal instability and microsatellite instability. This review aims to delineate the different pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis and provide an overview of the most recent advances in molecular pathological classification systems for colorectal cancer. Two molecular pathological classification systems for CRC have recently been proposed. Integrated molecular analysis by The Cancer Genome Atlas project is based on a wide-ranging genomic and transcriptomic characterisation study of CRC using array-based and sequencing technologies. This approach classified CRC into two major groups consistent with previous classification systems: (1) ∼16 % hypermutated cancers with either microsatellite instability (MSI) due to defective mismatch repair (∼13 %) or ultramutated cancers with DNA polymerase epsilon proofreading mutations (∼3 %); and (2) ∼84 % non-hypermutated, microsatellite stable (MSS) cancers with a high frequency of DNA somatic copy number alterations, which showed common mutations in APC, TP53, KRAS, SMAD4, and PIK3CA. The recent Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS) Consortium analysing CRC expression profiling data from multiple studies described four CMS groups: almost all hypermutated MSI cancers fell into the first category CMS1 (MSI-immune, 14 %) with the remaining MSS cancers subcategorised into three groups of CMS2 (canonical, 37 %), CMS3 (metabolic, 13 %) and CMS4 (mesenchymal, 23 %), with a residual unclassified group (mixed features, 13 %). Although further research is required to validate these two systems, they may be useful for clinical trial designs and future post-surgical adjuvant treatment decisions, particularly for tumours with aggressive features or predicted responsiveness to immune checkpoint blockade.

Indexed as

Microsatellite InstabilityPathology, MolecularColorectal NeoplasmsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMutationras Proteinsras ProteinsCancerChromosomal instabilityColorectalConsensus molecular subtypesDefective mismatch repairHypermutantMicrosatellite instabilityMutationPolymerase epsilonSerrated pathwaySomatic copy number alterationsThe Cancer Genome AtlasUltramutant

Identifiers

PMID27325016
PMCPMC4978761
OpenAlexW2467345490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.