Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27324917›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2016

The Enigma of Progressively Partial Endoreplication: New Insights Provided by Flow Cytometry and Next-Generation Sequencing.

Eva Hřibová, Kateřina Holušová, Pavel Trávníček, Beáta Petrovská, Jan Ponert, Hana Šimková, Barbora Kubátová, Jana Jersáková, Vladislav Čurn, Jan Suda and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reference standards for flow cytometric estimation of absolute nuclear DNA content in plants.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Eva HřibováCentre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Institute of Experimental Botany, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Kateřina HolušováCentre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Institute of Experimental Botany, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Pavel TrávníčekInstitute of Botany, the Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, Czech Republic Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic Biotechnological Centre, Faculty of Agriculture, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Beáta PetrovskáCentre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Institute of Experimental Botany, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Jan PonertDepartment of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic Prague Botanical Garden, Prague, Czech Republic.
Hana ŠimkováCentre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Institute of Experimental Botany, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Barbora KubátováBiotechnological Centre, Faculty of Agriculture, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Jana JersákováDepartment of Ecosystem Biology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Vladislav ČurnBiotechnological Centre, Faculty of Agriculture, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Jan SudaInstitute of Botany, the Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, Czech Republic Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav DoleželCentre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Institute of Experimental Botany, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Jan VránaCentre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Institute of Experimental Botany, Olomouc, Czech Republic vrana@ueb.cas.cz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many plant species, somatic cell differentiation is accompanied by endoreduplication, a process during which cells undergo one or more rounds of DNA replication cycles in the absence of mitosis, resulting in nuclei with multiples of 2C DNA amounts (4C, 8C, 16C, etc.). In some orchids, a disproportionate increase in nuclear DNA contents has been observed, where successive endoreduplication cycles result in DNA amounts 2C + P, 2C + 3P, 2C + 7P, etc., where P is the DNA content of the replicated part of the 2C nuclear genome. This unique phenomenon was termed "progressively partial endoreplication" (PPE). We investigated processes behind the PPE in Ludisia discolor using flow cytometry (FCM) and Illumina sequencing. In particular, we wanted to determine whether chromatin elimination or incomplete genome duplication was involved, and to identify types of DNA sequences that were affected. Cell cycle analysis of root tip cell nuclei pulse-labeled with EdU revealed two cell cycles, one ending above the population of nuclei with 2C + P content, and the other with a typical "horseshoe" pattern of S-phase nuclei ranging from 2C to 4C DNA contents. The process leading to nuclei with 2C + P amounts therefore involves incomplete genome replication. Subsequent Illumina sequencing of flow-sorted 2C and 2C + P nuclei showed that all types of repetitive DNA sequences were affected during PPE; a complete elimination of any specific type of repetitive DNA was not observed. We hypothesize that PPE is part of a highly controlled transition mechanism from proliferation phase to differentiation phase of plant tissue development.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusDNA ReplicationEndoreduplicationFlow CytometryGenome, PlantHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMitosisOrchidaceaePlant LeavesPolyploidycell cycleDNA replicationEdUendoreduplicationLudisia discolororchids

Identifiers

PMID27324917
PMCPMC4943206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.