Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27324903›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2016

Using Routine Outcome Measures to Provide Feedback at the Service Agency Level.

David Roe, Liron Lapid, Vered Baloush-Kleinman, Paula Garber-Epstein, Miriam Isolde Gornemann, Marc Gelkopf

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David RoeDepartment of Community Mental Health, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, 31905, Haifa, Israel.
Liron LapidDepartment of Community Mental Health, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, 31905, Haifa, Israel. lapid.liron@gmail.com.
Vered Baloush-KleinmanMental Health Services, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel.
Paula Garber-EpsteinCenter for Community Mental Health, Research, Practice and Policy, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Miriam Isolde GornemannCenter for Community Mental Health, Research, Practice and Policy, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Marc GelkopfDepartment of Community Mental Health, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, 31905, Haifa, Israel.
University of Haifa · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of routine outcome measurement (ROM) to assess service effectiveness has been on the rise in mental health settings. However, there is a scarcity of information on the use of ROM data to provide feedback to teams of service providers. In this paper we review the existing literature to identify the principles that can guide the use of ROM data as feedback with the aim to improve quality of service provision in mental health settings. We present a pilot trial of 12 agencies participating in group feedback sessions. The guiding principles and core processes, the procedure and implementation in a pilot trial, lessons learned and future directions are discussed. Based on this experience we conclude that using ROM to implement group feedback among mental health stakeholders is feasible and can generate discussions and directions for improvement.

Indexed as

Formative FeedbackOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality ImprovementFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMental Health ServicesPsychiatric RehabilitationFeedback to mental health service agenciesMental healthRehabilitation servicesRoutine outcome measures

Identifiers

PMID27324903
OpenAlexW2434576236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.