Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27324871›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of sports medicine2016

Diastasis recti abdominis during pregnancy and 12 months after childbirth: prevalence, risk factors and report of lumbopelvic pain.

Jorun Bakken Sperstad, Merete Kolberg Tennfjord, Gunvor Hilde, Marie Ellström-Engh, Kari Bø

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of sports medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 129 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04176874 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Robotic-assisted Diastasis of the Rectus Abdominis Muscles Repair: Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedure

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2020 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsDiastasis of Muscle, Other SiteArmsRobotic-assisted diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscles repair
NCT04519840 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A Cross Sectional Study to Determine the Association Between Diastasis Recti Abdominis and Sacroiliac Joint and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Outcomes Among Postpartum Women Who Underwent C-section in UAE

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorDubai Health AuthorityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled32ConditionsDiastasis Recti, Sacroiliac Joint Somatic Dysfunction, Pelvic Floor DisordersArmsnill
NCT05916833 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Hypopressive Breathing and Noble Technique on Diastasis Recti Abdominis in Postpartum Women.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsDiastasis Recti AbdominisArmshypopressive breathing, noble technique
NCT06286553 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Trunk Stabilization Exercise and Inspiratory Muscle Training Effects on Diastasis Recti Abdominis in Postpartum Women - A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PatrasRan2024 to 2026Enrolled48ConditionsDiastasis Recti And Weakness Of The Linea Alba, Diastasis, MuscleArmsTrunk exercise, Inspiratory Muscle Training (IMT), Control Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 321 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mesh repair versus suture plication for rectus diastasis: the results of meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Rectus diastasis is not a single entity: phenotype-specific controversies in surgical management.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Review

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jorun Bakken SperstadDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8058-4311
Merete Kolberg TennfjordDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Gunvor HildeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Marie Ellström-EnghDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kari BøDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Akershus University Hospital · NONorwegian School of Sport Sciences · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimDiastasis recti abdominis (DRA) is defined as a separation of the 2 muscle bellies of rectus abdominis. To date there is scant knowledge on prevalence, risk factors, and consequences of the condition. The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence of DRA during pregnancy and post partum, presence of possible risk factors, and the occurrence of lumbopelvic pain among women with and without DRA.

methodsThis prospective cohort study followed 300 first-time pregnant women from pregnancy till 12 months post partum. Data were collected by electronic questionnaire and clinical examinations. DRA was defined as a palpated separation of ≥2 fingerbreadths either 4.5 cm above, at or 4.5 cm below the umbilicus. Women with and without DRA were compared with independent samples Student's t-test and χ(2)/Fisher exact test, and OR with significance level >0.05.

resultsPrevalence of DRA was 33.1%, 60.0%, 45.4%, and 32.6% at gestation week 21, 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post partum, respectively. No difference in risk factors was found when comparing women with and without DRA. OR showed a greater likelihood for DRA among women reporting heavy lifting ≥20 times weekly (OR 2.18 95% CI 1.05 to 4.52). There was no difference in reported lumbopelvic pain (p=0.10) in women with and without DRA.

conclusionsPrevalence of mild DRA was high both during pregnancy and after childbirth. Women with and without DRA reported the same amount of lumbopelvic pain 12 months post partum.

Indexed as

Rectus AbdominisAdultFemaleHumansLow Back PainMuscular DiseasesNorwayPelvic PainPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrevalenceProspective StudiesRisk FactorsYoung AdultAbdomenLower backPelvicPregnancyRisk factor

Identifiers

PMID27324871
PMCPMC5013086
OpenAlexW2468477261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.