Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27324711›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Disclosing victimisation to healthcare professionals in Sweden: a constructivist grounded theory study of experiences among men exposed to interpersonal violence.

Johanna Simmons, Adrianus Jelmer Brüggemann, Katarina Swahnberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. More GP Consultations by Violence Victims: Results from the Representative German DEGS1 Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Barriers to Men's Help Seeking for Intimate Partner Violence.Journal of interpersonal violence · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johanna SimmonsDepartment of Acute Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0704-202X
Adrianus Jelmer BrüggemannDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden Department of Thematic Studies - Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Katarina SwahnbergDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a theoretical model concerning male victims' processes of disclosing experiences of victimisation to healthcare professionals in Sweden.

designQualitative interview study.

settingInformants were recruited from the general population and a primary healthcare centre in Sweden.

participantsInformants were recruited by means of theoretical sampling among respondents in a previous quantitative study. Eligible for this study were men reporting sexual, physical and/or emotional violence victimisation by any perpetrator and reporting that they either had talked to a healthcare provider about their victimisation or had wanted to do so.

methodConstructivist grounded theory. 12 interviews were performed and saturation was reached after 9.

resultsSeveral factors influencing the process of disclosing victimisation can be recognised from previous studies concerning female victims, including shame, fear of negative consequences of disclosing, specifics of the patient-provider relationship and time constraints within the healthcare system. However, this study extends previous knowledge by identifying strong negative effects of adherence to masculinity norms for victimised men and healthcare professionals on the process of disclosing. It is also emphasised that the process of disclosing cannot be separated from other, even seemingly unrelated, circumstances in the men's lives.

conclusionsThe process of disclosing victimisation to healthcare professionals was a complex process involving the men's experiences of victimisation, adherence to gender norms, their life circumstances and the dynamics of the actual healthcare encounter.

Indexed as

DisclosureHealth PersonnelAdultAgedCrime VictimsFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMasculinityMenMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalQualitative ResearchSexual PartnersAbuseGenderHelp-seekingMasculinityViolence

Identifiers

PMID27324711
PMCPMC4916578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.