Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27324543›Full record

SynthesisZhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics2016

[Efficacy of sweet solutions in relieving pain caused by vaccination in infants aged 1 to 12 months: a systematic review].

Shao-Lin Chen, Harrison Denise, Rui-Rui Huang, Qing Zhang, Ri-Hua Xie, Shi-Wu Wen

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Clinical effect of white noise combined with glucose in reducing the pain of retinopathy screening in preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2019
    Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shao-Lin ChenSchool of Nursing, Hunan University of Medicine, Huaihua, Hunan 418000, China. xierihua928@163.com.
Harrison Denise
Rui-Rui Huang
Qing Zhang
Ri-Hua Xie
Shi-Wu Wen
Huaihua University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the efficacy of oral sweet solutions in relieving pain caused by vaccination in infants aged 1 to 12 months.

methodsRelated databases were searched to find related randomized control trails (RCTs). The quality of these RCTs was evaluated. The Meta analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3.

resultsA total of 20 RCTs involving 2 376 infants were included, and quality assessment showed that 6 RCTs had grade A quality and 14 had grade B quality. The Meta analysis showed that compared with sterile water, 25%-75% oral sweet solution significantly reduced crying time (WMD=-21.16, 95%CI -39.66 to -2.77, P<0.05) and the proportion of crying time (the duration of crying /3-minute periods after the injection) (WMD=-13.83, 95%CI -20.88 to -6.78, P<0.01), while the crying time showed no significant difference between the group treated with oral administration of 12% sucrose solution and non-intervention group. Co ONCLUSIONS: Oral sweet solution (25%-75%; 2 mL) given 2 minutes before vaccination can effectively relieve the pain caused by vaccination in infants aged 1-12 months.

Indexed as

CryingHumansInfantPainSolutionsSucroseVaccinationSolutionsSucrose

Identifiers

PMID27324543
PMCPMC7389092
OpenAlexW2474914618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.