ReviewCirculation2016
The Future of Arrhythmias and Electrophysiology.
Review in Circulation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prioritizing Discovery and Advancements in Arrhythmia Therapies: NIH/NHLBI Workshop.JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2026Review
- National Mortality Trends, Disparities, and Forecasted Burden of Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure with Underlying Ischemic Heart Disease Among Older Adults in the United States, 1999-2023.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2026Article
- Development of an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiography to Detect 23 Cardiac Arrhythmias and Predict Cardiovascular Outcomes.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- Ultrathin crystalline silicon-based omnidirectional strain gauges for implantable/wearable characterization of soft tissue biomechanics.Science advances · 2024Article
- Revolutionizing Cardiac Anesthesia: A Comprehensive Review of Contemporary Approaches Outside the Operating Room.Cureus · 2024Review
- Editorial: Acquired and Inherited Cardiac Arrhythmias.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Evaluation of a novel cardiac signal processing system for electrophysiology procedures: The PURE EP 2.0 study.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2021Article
- Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients with Heart Disease and Preserved Systolic Function: Current Options for Risk Stratification.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Procedural outcomes and learning curve of cardiac arrhythmias catheter ablation using remote magnetic navigation: Experience from a large-scale single-center study.Clinical cardiology · 2020Observational
- Towards a Structural View of Drug Binding to hERG KTrends in pharmacological sciences · 2017Review
- Powerlessness of a Number: Why Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Matters Less for Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Assessment.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.