ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2017
Amikacin in Critically Ill Patients: A Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Studies.
Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Population Pharmacokinetic Studies of Digoxin in Adult Patients: A Systematic Review.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2021Pooled it
- Antibiotics in Adult Cystic Fibrosis Patients: A Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2021Pooled it
- Quantification and Explanation of the Variability of First-Dose Amikacin Concentrations in Critically Ill Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department: A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2021Trial
- Elucidating the mechanism of amikacin-induced acute kidney injury: a multilevel analysis based on the FAERS database and network toxicology.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Population Pharmacokinetics of Amikacin in Non-Neonatal Pediatric Patients: A Scoping Review.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2026Article
- Chitosan nanoparticle encapsulated pentoxifylline improves renal protection and reduces oxidative stress in amikacin induced nephrotoxicity.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Amikacin exposure in MDR-TB patients in Uganda: Revisiting old drugs in a new era of resistance - A pharmacokinetic assessment.New microbes and new infections · 2026Article
- Amikacin toxicity revisited: pentoxifylline offers protection in high-risk treatment scenarios.AMB Express · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring-Based Population Pharmacokinetics of Amikacin in Patients at a Teaching Hospital.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Anti-infectives in Pediatric Patients with Cystic Fibrosis: A Comprehensive Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2025Review
- Amikacin Dosing Adjustment in Critically Ill Oncologic Patients: A Study with Real-World Patients, PBPK Analysis, and Digital Twins.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Population pharmacokinetics and humanized dosage regimens matching the peak, area, trough, and range of amikacin plasma concentrations in immune-competent murine bloodstream and lung infection models.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Failure to predict amikacin elimination in critically ill patients with cancer based on the estimated glomerular filtration rate: applying PBPK approach in a therapeutic drug monitoring study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2023Article
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Amikacin in Neutropenic Oncology Patients.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Development of a Predictive Dosing Nomogram to Achieve PK/PD Targets of Amikacin Initial Dose in Critically Ill Patients: A Non-Parametric Approach.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Individualized antibiotic dosage regimens for patients with augmented renal clearance.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Malaria and typhoid fever among patients presenting with febrile illnesses in Ga West Municipality, Ghana.PloS one · 2023Article
- Synergistic effect of low-frequency ultrasound and antibiotics on the treatment of Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia in mice.Microbial biotechnology · 2022Article
- Amikacin-loaded niosome nanoparticles improve amikacin activity against antibiotic-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2022Article
- Population pharmacokinetics of apramycin from first-in-human plasma and urine data to support prediction of efficacious dose.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmikacin is an aminoglycoside commonly used in intensive care units for the treatment of patients with life-threatening Gram-negative infections. Although aminoglycosides are extensively used, the accurate determination of their optimal dosage is complicated by marked intra- and interindividual variability in intensive care unit patients. Amikacin pharmacokinetics have been described in numerous studies over the past 25 years.
objectiveThis review presents a synthesis of the population pharmacokinetic models for amikacin described in critically ill patients. The objective was to determine whether there was a consensus on a structural model and which covariates had been identified.
methodsA literature search was conducted from the PubMed database, from its inception up until December 2015, using the following terms: 'amikacin', 'pharmacokinetic(s)', 'population', 'model(ling)' and 'nonlinear mixed effect'. Articles were excluded if they were not pertinent. The reference lists of all selected articles were also evaluated.
resultsTen articles were included in this review: pharmacokinetics of amikacin were described by a one-compartment or a two-compartment model. Various covariates were tested, but only two (creatinine clearance and total body weight) were included in almost all of the described models. After inclusion of these covariates, the interindividual variability (range) in clearance and the volume of distribution were 44.4 % (28.2-69.4 %) and 31.3 % (8.1-44.7 %), respectively. The residual variability (range) was around 21.0 % (9.0-31.0 %), using a proportional model, and for a combined model (proportional/additive), the median (range) values were 0.615 mg/L (0.2-1.03 mg/L) and 29.2 % (26.8-31.6 %).
conclusionThis review highlights the different population pharmacokinetic models for amikacin developed in critically ill patients over the past decades and proposes relevant information for clinicians and researchers. To optimize amikacin dosage, this review points out the relevant covariates according to the target population. In a population of critically ill patients, dose optimization mainly depends on creatinine clearance and total body weight. New pharmacokinetic population studies could be considered, with new covariates of interest to be tested in model building and to further explain variability. Another future perspective could be external evaluation of previously published models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.