ArticleScientific reports2016
Comparative proteomic study of Arabidopsis mutants mpk4 and mpk6.
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- The lignin deposition responses of different poplar root systems to salt stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Proteomics: An Essential Tool to Study Plant-Specialized Metabolism.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Cell Fractionation and the Identification of Host Proteins Involved in Plant-Virus Interactions.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Dynamics of ribosome composition and ribosomal protein phosphorylation in immune signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Knockout of MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE 3 causes barley root resistance against Fusarium graminearum.Plant physiology · 2022Article
- Identification of Selenoprotein H Isoforms and Impact of Selenoprotein H Overexpression on Protein But Not mRNA Levels of 2 Other Selenoproteins in 293T Cells.The Journal of nutrition · 2021Article
- An apocrine mechanism delivers a fully immunocompetent exocrine secretion.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- TALEN-BasedFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- CsWRKY25 Improves Resistance of Citrus Fruit toFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Signaling Toward Reactive Oxygen Species-Scavenging Enzymes in Plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
- Seasonal variation in equine follicular fluid proteome.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2019Article
- Proteomic Analysis of ArabidopsisFrontiers in plant science · 2019Article
- Biochemical and Genetic Interactions of Phospholipase D Alpha 1 and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3 Affect Arabidopsis Stress Response.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Article
- Shot-Gun Proteomic Analysis on Roots of ArabidopsisInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Evolutionary and expression analysis of CAMTA gene family in Nicotiana tabacum yielded insights into their origin, expansion and stress responses.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Construction and evaluation of type III secretion system mutants of the catfish pathogen Edwardsiella piscicida.Journal of fish diseases · 2018Article
- Comprehensive genomic analysis of the CNGC gene family in Brassica oleracea: novel insights into synteny, structures, and transcript profiles.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Protein Composition of the Bovine Herpesvirus 1.1 Virion.Veterinary sciences · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Arabidopsis MPK4 and MPK6 are implicated in different signalling pathways responding to diverse external stimuli. This was recently correlated with transcriptomic profiles of Arabidopsis mpk4 and mpk6 mutants, and thus it should be reflected also on the level of constitutive proteomes. Therefore, we performed a shot gun comparative proteomic analysis of Arabidopsis mpk4 and mpk6 mutant roots. We have used bioinformatic tools and propose several new proteins as putative MPK4 and MPK6 phosphorylation targets. Among these proteins in the mpk6 mutant were important modulators of development such as CDC48A and phospholipase D alpha 1. In the case of the mpk4 mutant transcriptional reprogramming might be mediated by phosphorylation and change in the abundance of mRNA decapping complex VCS. Further comparison of mpk4 and mpk6 root differential proteomes showed differences in the composition and regulation of defense related proteins. The mpk4 mutant showed altered abundances of antioxidant proteins. The examination of catalase activity in response to oxidative stress revealed that this enzyme might be preferentially regulated by MPK4. Finally, we proposed developmentally important proteins as either directly or indirectly regulated by MPK4 and MPK6. These proteins contribute to known phenotypic defects in the mpk4 and mpk6 mutants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.